the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 as an investement it looks ok to me. a risk like any football club. i do wonder if dave kings expecting a big fall in share price otherwise why wait to invest. the moneys going to rangers and will boost profits but those profits will then be leeched back out in dividends. it should make us stronger but certinly not as strong as it could and perhaps should be making us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 From what I read no dividends are guaranteed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 they rarely are. but you can make sure to pay them most of the time if you cut costs accordingly etc. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 its really this simple every penny paid out in a dividend reduces the quality on the park. slows our recovery or holds the team back. take you pick for how you describe it. green may well not be the antichrist but it would be better if we had owners not taking cash out. better still if they were putting it in. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted December 8, 2012 Author Share Posted December 8, 2012 Anyone got any idea what this "other identified projects" refers to with regards to where the money is going? Seems a bit of a wishy washy way to describe where millions of pounds from the placing will be going surely? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 its really this simple every penny paid out in a dividend reduces the quality on the park. slows our recovery or holds the team back. take you pick for how you describe it. green may well not be the antichrist but it would be better if we had owners not taking cash out. better still if they were putting it in. Was it ever realistic that dividends would be totally off the table? This is business. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 Anyone got any idea what this "other identified projects" refers to with regards to where the money is going? Seems a bit of a wishy washy way to describe where millions of pounds from the placing will be going surely? Key point surely though is none of it is going into someone's back pocket? Is a penny for penny breakdown realistic? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 Was it ever realistic that dividends would be totally off the table? This is business. i think it is yes. dave king or tbk or walters consortium would not have been paying dividends imho. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 Key point surely though is none of it is going into someone's back pocket? Is a penny for penny breakdown realistic? not directly but if you invest to boost profits and boosting profits pays a dividend etc.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 i think it is yes. dave king or tbk or walters consortium would not have been paying dividends imho. I meant for now, what has things that never happened got to do with it? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.