GovanAllan 0 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 Yeah thats fair enough. i'm only going by what they say but saying something and doing it are different. As I said my friend its all about the opinions, and I doubt the No Mark No Money Kinghts would've done much better to get the money into the club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 As I said my friend its all about the opinions, and I doubt the No Mark No Money Kinghts would've done much better to get the money into the club. i dont think they would have offered a dividend etc so wouldn't have got the institutional investers but i do know they were planning on putting in more themselves. they wouldnt have been having a share issue so soon i expect anyway. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,059 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 IMHO that's pish, but then its only my opinion but I think it's right. Neither of the 3 would have countenanced paying a dividend, King was adamant we'd need 'Sugar Daddy' funding for a number of years, 'Walter's consortium' was more or less a rehashed Blue Knights. I'm not convinced Green & Co will pay a dividend in the foreseeable future either, to do so prematurely would be an act of folly. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 After Murray and Whyte's false promises i've had enough of sugar daddies. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 false sugar daddys. i would take shake mansur in a heartbeat. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 Never getting them in Scottish Football. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuznetsov 0 Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 tims will be all over this like flies on sh*te. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 Neither of the 3 would have countenanced paying a dividend, King was adamant we'd need 'Sugar Daddy' funding for a number of years, 'Walter's consortium' was more or less a rehashed Blue Knights. I'm not convinced Green & Co will pay a dividend in the foreseeable future either, to do so prematurely would be an act of folly. We should never have a sugar daddy any where near Ibrox ever again, or no mark false investors. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 tims will be all over this like flies on sh*te. All over what? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 yeah fuck of mansur and abrahmovic we want hedge funds 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.