Darthter 542 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 A few months ago, many folk on here were crying out about the clubs ownership - "We should never have one person in charge again" were the cries. However, now that the club is effectively owned by multiple people/trusts/organisations, I am noticing a shift....people have been moaning about multiple, faceless entities owning part of the club, and I am detecting some subtle hints that some folk would like to see a single wealthy owner again, that can support the club financially - Ian McColl's name being mentioned again..... Do fans REALLY know what they want ownership-wise, and do the fans REALLY know what is best for the club at a corporate level in order for it to progress and remain financially sound??? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 i dont have a problem with one person owning us if its the right person. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted December 17, 2012 Author Share Posted December 17, 2012 i dont have a problem with one person owning us if its the right person. How would you define the "right" person??? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 I'll settle for the support to own 25% of the club one day. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 How would you define the "right" person??? running us in a financially sound and sustainable manner and not taking any cash out. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted December 17, 2012 Author Share Posted December 17, 2012 running us in a financially sound and sustainable manner and not taking any cash out. but, you'd expect them to put loads in though??? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real PapaBear 0 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 but, you'd expect them to put loads in though??? absolutely. And Why not? They are buying the prestige and status that will go with being the owner of the club. This isn't Brechin we're talking about. The owner of a well run Rangers can enjoy quite a bit of access to some top European tables and the company of some extremely powerful people; good for the ego and potentially good for other business. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 but, you'd expect them to put loads in though??? that would be even better. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 but, you'd expect them to put loads in though??? No need for a single owner to plough in millions, the support generate plenty enough to sustain us. Sadly the club is full of leeches, which makes it much worse than anything a single owner could do. Not many successful clubs have greens business model that he's convinced most of us as the way to go. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 I'm surprised you surprised Darther, you should know by now Rangers fans love nothing more than having a moan. If an Arab sheik rolled up tomorrow we would have a moan about that as well. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.