simplythebest 0 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 RANGERS Football Club today received notification of the SFA Arbitration Panelâ??s decision which ruled that the Club did not inherit the right to continue the arbitration process started by oldco. This was always a possible outcome of what was purely a procedural hearing. Suspecting this would be the outcome, the Club had already filed a further Notice to Refer under SFA Article 99. This was done before the end of last year and that process will now continue. The Club had argued that since oldcoâ??s registration had been transferred to newco the right to continue the case would also have transferred. Nothing has been won or lost at this stage and the Club will continue with its action. http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/item/3262-sfa-arbitration-statement Hmmm? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,430 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 And this means? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuznetsov 0 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 we disputing something with the sfa from last year? what was it? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 This is to do with the arbitration proceedings that were started on 5th July and the claim from Green & co that a bunch of players had terminated their contracts unlawfully. The players were Alan McGregor, Kyle Lafferty, Sone Aluko, Steven Naismith, Steven Whittaker and Jamie Ness, but I don't know if that's changed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,288 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 So what happens now ? will we get compensation for these deserters or not? why then was there a hearing earlier this month with the SFA regarding these deserters ? why did the SFA wait until now to say this ? why did they let the hearing take place? are the SFA at it again ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuznetsov 0 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 So what happens now ? will we get compensation for these deserters or not? why then was there a hearing earlier this month with the SFA regarding these deserters ? why did the SFA wait until now to say this ? why did they let the hearing take place? are the SFA at it again ? the sfa are always at it mate. riddled with vhermin and full of poison. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 RANGERS Football Club today received notification of the SFA Arbitration Panel’s decision which ruled that the Club did not inherit the right to continue the arbitration process started by oldco. This was always a possible outcome of what was purely a procedural hearing. Suspecting this would be the outcome, the Club had already filed a further Notice to Refer under SFA Article 99. This was done before the end of last year and that process will now continue. The Club had argued that since oldco’s registration had been transferred to newco the right to continue the case would also have transferred. Nothing has been won or lost at this stage and the Club will continue with its action. http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/headli...tion-statement You would think that since the SFA ruled, as part of the five-way agreement required to gain re-entry to the SFL3, that if the newco had to pay the oldco footballing debts then it should be able to recover its footballing losses. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,288 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 can't help thinking the SFA have back-heeled this i.e. don't want responsibility for taking the decision whether we're due compensation for the deserters or not. Maybe we'll need to go to an employment tribunal of some sort 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMazza 0 Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 The SFA yet again deciding whether we are the same club or not, as and when it suits them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,348 Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 This is to do with the arbitration proceedings that were started on 5th July and the claim from Green & co that a bunch of players had terminated their contracts unlawfully. The players were Alan McGregor, Kyle Lafferty, Sone Aluko, Steven Naismith, Steven Whittaker and Jamie Ness, but I don't know if that's changed. Are you sure? This had nothing to do with oldco and therefore why would it start proceedings? It was newco that has the issue with the players. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.