Zappa 0 Posted February 26, 2013 Author Share Posted February 26, 2013 i thought walsh was a striker ? Elfideldo's the one in the know, but I've seen glimpses of Walsh on RangersTV and he's always looked as if he's attacking the penalty box from the right wing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annan Bear 0 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 I fear if we put Gallacher in goals with that defence it would do more harm than good. We are so poor at the back that Scott could become unnecessarily exposed. If we were solid at the back then yes but at the moment no. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,163 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 I think Walsh is a right-sided midfielder. And, yes, I'd give Gallacher a chance in goal at some point but if we're to promote Gasparotto then it would be a bit risky to play both immediately. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeardyGuts 6 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Agree. Not a fan of Alexander anyway. What about at Right Back....surely to christ we must have one youngster better than Agyriou....he is hopeless. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,163 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 I don't mind Argyriou that much but he certainly doesn't get forward enough. I'd certainly say he's better than Hegarty or Faure in that position. Darren Cole is perhaps the pick of the bunch but seems to be permanently injured. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 I think Walsh is a right-sided midfielder. And, yes, I'd give Gallacher a chance in goal at some point but if we're to promote Gasparotto then it would be a bit risky to play both immediately. what risk we are 20 points clear. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,163 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 what risk we are 20 points clear. The risk isn't to our promotion chances but more to the development of the player. Some will say it's the ideal time to test a player during a difficult period for the unit within the team; others will say a bad game for them will put him back a fair bit. It's decisions like those which make a manager earn his huge wage. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 The risk isn't to our promotion chances but more to the development of the player. Some will say it's the ideal time to test a player during a difficult period for the unit within the team; others will say a bad game for them will put him back a fair bit. It's decisions like those which make a manager earn his huge wage. true. at least in part. a good manager would get a player through any poor performance without it affecting them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,163 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 true. at least in part. a good manager would get a player through any poor performance without it affecting them. A manager can't always judge the mental capabilities of a player until they thrown in. There's always an element of risk. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whosthedado 1,511 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Personally I think the defence is obviously shaky enough without throwing a rookie keeper into the mix too 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.