djbroxybear 0 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 RST Board Statement The board of the Rangers Supporters' Trust today calls for the future of Chief Executive Charles Green to be decided by the Board of the club and for Charles Green and Imran Ahmad to pursue legal action against Craig Whyte. Our club needs clarity over two major issues - the future of Charles Green and the ongoing claims of Craig Whyte. The proper places for these two to be handled are, respectively, the Ibrox boardroom and a court of law. The Board of the club has enjoyed the backing of the overwhelming majority of the Rangers Family and to date no valid concern about its operation or composition has been aired. Therefore, it has the competency and authority to deal with the matters surrounding Mr Greenâ??s recent performance without interference from the media or external bodies. With regard to Mr Whyteâ??s claims, the Board can question the directors and employees concerned in a confidential manner which should provide additional clarity. Craig Whyte will never be an acceptable owner or investor in Rangers - his allegations appear so outrageous and injurious to the club that only a court appearance will force him to provide conclusive evidence of his claims. As he is alleging collusion between himself, Mr Green and Mr Ahmad we believe that the situation now requires judicial examination and recommend that Mr Green and Mr Ahmad instigate legal proceedings against Craig Whyte without delay. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 More like it, let's see if it provokes a reply from the CEO about Whyte. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 1,876 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 I think the club needs to do more than deal with these issues in private. Otherwise more and more supporters, investors and sponsors are likely to get twitchy. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 Ach I don't know, I'm a member of the RST now but do we need to be seen doing or saying something at present? Any message they want to convey could get lost in all the bluster and shouting from the Mhedia. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 two chances of green taking whyte to court. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 If there's a possible police investigation for blackmail (as I've heard) on top of the outstanding one (ones?) is this not all subjudice with regards to being discussed in the media and being scrutinised by the SFA? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 clever statement actually. supports the board but calls them out as well. if whyte is lying prove it in court. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 clever statement actually. supports the board but calls them out as well. if whyte is lying prove it in court. Surely it should be Whyte going to court to prove he's not lying. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 Surely it should be Whyte going to court to prove he's not lying. green is the man who has to prove whyte is or loose everything. he better get to court bloody fast. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.