Darthter 542 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 I believe the proposed meeting to consider relevant action over Hearts administration has been postponed twice. Committee members keep going on holiday, and really there is no appetite to fine the Jambos. Also, the Hearts administrator said that ANY financial penalty could sink they club....I can see the SFA/SPFL holding off as long as physically possible so that they are not responsible for killing the club. Most probable outcome - transfer embargo (again...) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real PapaBear 0 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Also, the Hearts administrator said that ANY financial penalty could sink they club....I can see the SFA/SPFL holding off as long as physically possible so that they are not responsible for killing the club. Most probable outcome - transfer embargo (again...) but...but..but... sporting integrity and all that... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
26th of foot 5,859 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 but...but..but... sporting integrity and all that... 'Strip the titles(cups in Herats case)', 'contrition', and, 'we will consult our support' will ensue? Surely, .......................... oh wait a minute, that is sooooooooo last year. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,118 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Look, we need to draw a line under what has gone before and move forward building Scottish football for the good of all concerned. Don't be asking awkward questions that might actually require a bit of parity. Am I being too cynical? No you're not. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCF2008 0 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 “If not, and if there is a request to transfer their share, the matter will be dealt with by our board. “There is no point in speculating about what may or may not happen." Of course there isn't any point. The rules rules were changed to allow the clubs to vote in Rangers case, but the 'new' SPFL board can do whatever the hell it likes. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LoyalBear Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Doncaster isn't fit for the position he has secured, I'm sorry but if your league hasn't got a sponsor( 20% of yearly income) and he says he isn't bothered his position is clearly untenable. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
26th of foot 5,859 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Neil appeared on Radio Snyde for an hour tonight. Jim ra Tim Delahunt sought permission from Peter to work him from the back. Neil wants to look forwards, not back. Delighted with Pars United's take-over and acceptance of CVA. If Hearts fall into liquidation then the SPFL have changed the rules ie all 42 member clubs no longer get to vote on sanctions, instead the 6 man SPFL Board make the decisions. Thus, situation no change. Peter decides. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LoyalBear Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Neil appeared on Radio Snyde for an hour tonight. Jim ra Tim Delahunt sought permission from Peter to work him from the back. Neil wants to look forwards, not back. Delighted with Pars United's take-over and acceptance of CVA. If Hearts fall into liquidation then the SPFL have changed the rules ie all 42 member clubs no longer get to vote on sanctions, instead the 6 man SPFL Board make the decisions. Thus, situation no change. Peter decides. Can't say I'm surprised, Peter Liewell decides everything for those bunch of cowards. Nothing but lap dogs and puppets. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.