More info from @CharlotteFakes (now back after twitter suspension)

[Zappa 0]

• Suspension lifted. Let's get to the bottom of who has most to hide. No punches pulled.
  
• Despite Charles having ownership of over 5 million shares at 1p each, not 1 had been paid for until a forced deduction from final salary.
  
• Why did the board sanction a £600k pay off and not go down the misconduct route despite privately sharing so many reasons to do so?
  
• At the Pinsent Masons meeting on 29 April 2013, directors wanted to follow the money regarding the purchase of Green's property in France.
  
• Tom Stocker advised that this was not part of the investigation and that they should stick to matters relating to Craig Whyte.
  
• On that very same date Pinsent Masons stated that they would be unlikely to give a clean bill of health to Green/Ahmad as regards dealings which they/5088 may have had with Craig Whyte.
  
• 17/5/2013 Messrs Green, Ahmad Whyte, Earley and others were invited to provide information to the Investigation but have not yet done so.
  
• PM were instructed to conclude the report despite the lack of co-operation by all the main players. How can the accounts give comfort?
  
• Despite a request by the SFO to review the report, this was denied on the basis of legal privilege. RIFC do not consider that there are any events which should be reported to the SFO. This was despite the fact that Pinsent Masons were now about to move on to stage 2.
  
• AIM and the SFA also asked to see the report. On the 31 May it was made clear that the current RIFC boards way of thinking was to deny giving the SFA a copy of the report in any format. Indeed the main cause of concern between lawyers was the difficulties it may cause if AIM are permitted to view but the SFA are still denied. Legal Privilege was used as the excuse. Well worth checking up if the SFA ever received a hard copy. It is plainly clear that as at the end of May 2013, the SFA were to be denied access by the board.
  
• So the primary basis of all comfort from the fact that CW had no rights to the assets appears to have been delivered by FFW.
  
• Despite being the company lawyer, several of the board wanted to report Christine/FFW so that the companies activities could be investigated
  
• I shall come back to some of the other payments under investigation later. The existing board cannot be permitted to continue the cover up.
  
• A nomad should act with the utmost of integrity. However the most recent of requisitions was engineered by Cenkos on their day of departure.
  
• Rather than facilitate a smooth handover, Cenkos took the lead role in the recently aborted coup which has crippled the board. A signal was given to them by another director to engage 15 others inc McColl, King, Artemis, Hargreave Hale and Miton, to name but a few. Cenkos turned against their very own client and were given the blessing to proceed if they could gather the support. Very cloak and dagger.
  
• During one of the numerous AIM investigations into RIFC, Cenkos were able to confirm that as a result of terminations, leaks should cease.
  
• Also it was stated to the regulators that the email server, hosted by a third party, had been breached. *This is news to me. Had such an intrusion taken place, I would have heard about it. I would therefore urge all to ask RIFC for further clarification and implications.
  
• 
  

Edited October 2, 2013 by Zappa

[der Berliner 3,249]

This ongoing - IMHO criminal and illegal - leaking of confidental information is utterly embarrassing.

 

(Yes, I know that the more comes out about the club's leadership dealings is of utmost interest to all people wanting to have a go at Green, D&P and everyone connected, who tells us that it will stop if these chaps are removed? And it is obvious that much of what is being produced caters to certain section of the media and other people.)

[Zappa 0]

This ongoing - IMHO criminal and illegal - leaking of confidental information is utterly embarrassing.

 

(Yes, I know that the more comes out about the club's leadership dealings is of utmost interest to all people wanting to have a go at Green, D&P and everyone connected, who tells us that it will stop if these chaps are removed? And it is obvious that much of what is being produced caters to certain section of the media and other people.)

 

If we had had enough leaks and information coming out about what Craig Whyte was up to with non-payment of tax etc, then we might not have had to go through an administration event at all last year.

[simplythebest 0]

Wake me up when all this is done.

[pete 2,499]

Wake me up when all this is done.

 

You will have died from old age without living a life.

[forlanssister 3,050]

Wake me up when all this is done.

 

Is that so you can apply for a Visiting Order to go and see Chuckles?

[Frankie 8,151]

Still astounded this leak hasn't been plugged.

 

No matter who you back in this saga, the constant leaking of information and clear inability/reluctance to plug the leak is embarrassing for Rangers FC and Police Scotland.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Wake me up when all this is done.

 

Time to wake up now before its to late.

 

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 4

[der Berliner 3,249]

Time to wake up now before its to late.

 

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 4

 

The problem for us all on here is that no matter how wake you are, you are essentially a helpless spectator. Which makes it all the more frustrating. (NB: And the same would probably be relevant when Green did all the D&P deals ... )

[the gunslinger 3,366]

I think if you areva shareholder or even season book holder you have some power. Even if you just go to matches. I will be making my voice heard at the dunfermline game for sure.

 

But it requires a collective effort and even then you are largly correct.