Anchorman 0 Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 "As a matter of priority, the company, working with its advisers, will now seek to strengthen the board, both to meet the standards required for an AIM company, and to achieve stability through a consensus amongst major shareholders, which can then be considered by all shareholders at the Annual General Meeting." Am I reading too much into this after the comments during the week (spun by toxic Jack no doubt) about Dave King not meeting the AIM required standards? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 "As a matter of priority, the company, working with its advisers, will now seek to strengthen the board, both to meet the standards required for an AIM company, and to achieve stability through a consensus amongst major shareholders, which can then be considered by all shareholders at the Annual General Meeting." Am I reading too much into this after the comments during the week (spun by toxic Jack no doubt) about Dave King not meeting the AIM required standards? Coming from the Easdales it's quite funny. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,186 Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 "As a matter of priority, the company, working with its advisers, will now seek to strengthen the board, both to meet the standards required for an AIM company, and to achieve stability through a consensus amongst major shareholders, which can then be considered by all shareholders at the Annual General Meeting." Am I reading too much into this after the comments during the week (spun by toxic Jack no doubt) about Dave King not meeting the AIM required standards? Various club statements are littered with unprofessional and divisive digs so who knows... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,290 Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 I would assume that the standards required by the AIM inlcude a CEO and a certain number of directors. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted October 16, 2013 Author Share Posted October 16, 2013 I would assume that the standards required by the AIM inlcude a CEO and a certain number of directors. You are probably right and I am reading too much into it. It's what this Club does to you these days!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crucible 0 Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 Looks like the major shareholders are going to appoint and the minor shareholders are going to have to lump it or like it. "through a consensus amongst major shareholders, which can then be considered by all shareholders" 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 Looks like the major shareholders are going to appoint and the minor shareholders are going to have to lump it or like it. "through a consensus amongst major shareholders, which can then be considered by all shareholders" Thats the question though, who is major and who is minor. The institutional Investors behind Murray et all, or the block which the Eadales front? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.