Jump to content

 

 

RFC Statement: Today's Daily Record


Recommended Posts

Whoever the new CEO is needs to be prepared to go after the pondlife employed in these publications and take appropriate action where required. A indefinite ban from Ibrox for this newspaper and its so-called journalists will do for starters.

 

I will go with the club over the Rangers hating rhebel any day and any way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will go with the club over the Rangers hating rhebel any day and any way.

 

That's exactly the mindset this poor statement is aimed at. It absolutely reeks of trying to curry favour with the support through attacking the Record (and not for the first time from this board, GreenCo or the PR disaster on leg's Jack Irvine).

 

It's literally one stop short of calling the Record the "rhebel" as you've done yourself. I wish I could say it's not kidding anyone, but sadly it's doing exactly that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Accurate statement albeit it could sound a bit more professional.

 

Would you mind sharing with me how you know it is accurate? I don't know either way, although (and this says a hell of a lot) I would sooner believe the Record than Rangers official statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any person who is being recruited for a CEO position is going to insist that he/she gets to run the club their own way. That includes getting to choose his/her own 'C-Suite' (e.g. CFO) as well as being given a high degree of freedom of action by the Board. That freedom of action would also imply control over the PR function.

 

My guess is that the Record's information is 3rd hand. In other words, he told someone who told the Record. That does not mean that the Record's information is necessarily wrong. Gardiner probably realises that taking the job with certain people in place and unmovable would make life extremely difficult given the extent of the dissatisfaction with those individuals amongst the support.

 

I doubt that he made the removal of certain people a condition of taking the job. The question was probably couched in more theoretical terms. Perhaps a 'for example' type of question …….

 

"for example, if I wanted to change the CFO and/or the PR consultants would the board give me that power?"

 

I find it curious that the press release spoke of "many constructive and friendly face to face meetings and phone calls with our PR adviser". Makes you wonder who is running the club.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.