Waltersgotstyle 297 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 Terrible statement. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Bear 0 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 Absolutely pitiful. We are paying handsomely for the privilege of having our club embarrassed on a daily basis. Perhaps Jack will be scouting players for us next. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 Would you mind sharing with me how you know it is accurate? I don't know either way, although (and this says a hell of a lot) I would sooner believe the Record than Rangers official statements. Anti-Rangers bias is spot on. And I wouldn't trust the record to tell me what day it was. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,153 Posted November 15, 2013 Author Share Posted November 15, 2013 Anti-Rangers bias is spot on. And I wouldn't trust the record to tell me what day it was. But you would Jack Irvine, Stockbridge and the others who employ him? I trust neither them nor the Record. That's the problem. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 Anti-Rangers bias is spot on. And I wouldn't trust the record to tell me what day it was. Jack Irvine certainly is full of anti-Rangers bias. He is working purely for the parasites and their short term gain. Not so sure about your 2nd point, at least one or two employed by the record are fighting for the long term good of the institution that is Rangers Football Club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 Jack Irvine certainly is full of anti-Rangers bias. He is working purely for the parasites and their short term gain. Not so sure about your 2nd point, at least one or two employed by the record are fighting for the long term good of the institution that is Rangers Football Club. Buying into this Keith Jackson is a good Rangers man myth then? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 But you would Jack Irvine, Stockbridge and the others who employ him? I trust neither them nor the Record. That's the problem. I think i've expressed my mistrust and dislike of Toxic Jack a few times, but it doesn't make me give the likes of the record any credence either. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 Buying into this Keith Jackson is a good Rangers man myth then? No, not at all. But Jack is a bit easier to read, black and white even. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 Presumably the Easdales are getting Uncle Jack to spell check their teenage rebellion. Possibly taking a leaf out of old Charle's handbook in slagging off the Daily Record to play to the gallery for the many simple minded supporters we have 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 If it is as inaccurate as the say it is - they can always complain to the Press Complaints Commission. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.