Frankie 8,151 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 There's an image of it in the first post. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 Doing a deal with a directors mate is fine if its best for the club. But under sdm his son bought the car park his company edminson house. His catering firm got the catering contract. If you bought a ticket it was through his call center. All ver incestuous. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,315 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 There's an image of it in the first post. Its not showing up on my screen! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,315 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 Doing a deal with a directors mate is fine if its best for the club. But under sdm his son bought the car park his company edminson house. His catering firm got the catering contract. If you bought a ticket it was through his call center. All ver incestuous. Spot on. I dont know how any constitution would have prevented Murray from doing what he done during his asset-stripping years. I also agree with Bluedell's warning that it may sometimes be in our interests to be able to move the Stadium out of the trading company to safeguard it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 There are ways to safeguard the stadium from asset stripping amd still retain flexibility. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.