forlanssister 3,050 Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 I would assume once they all start talking with one another rather than about one another, it might come to a quicker change than we all expected. I do reckon that a few of the institutional investors will look for / demand a certain guarantee should a new share issue happen by (i.e. not diluting their sharehold too much), but can be dealt with. Once King talks to the people who put the current board in place ... and talks to the board chaps himself, things will become much clearer. So far, it all reeks of pre-election party-politics ... with the voters (i.e. us) left guessing. You do realise that not diluting their shareholding is entirely up to the relevant institution themselves and nobody else. As for Prior ... isn't it the case that he, as a minor-major shareholder can demand access to the books and see where money goes. Where his money goes. What the state of affairs is? Did he not get transparency when he first bought shares et al? No that's just utter nonsense. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 bit harsh, no? Apart from the wee blitz when he first got involved, he's been quiet as a church mouse since - unless I've missed something. Ach, probably. & he's quite entitled to speak out, as well. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 You do feel that Prior is a bit of a media junkie, but promising words nonetheless. He reminds me of Craig Whyte. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.