Bluedell 5,329 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 In theory though, could RIFC sell the shares in RFC to a third party? In theory, yes, but it become difficult as RIFC is a quoted company and would probably need an EGM to sell its shares. If it approved it, the shareholders would be left holding shares in a company that had no trade and just had cash (on the assumption that the inter-company balance was cleared). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 The Group accounts were submitted on 30/12/13, so that doesn't appear to be a valid excuse. yet it is his excuse. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 He knows what's best for rangers It seems to be a two pronged approach from him. On one hand he's in contact with and supportive of all the key 'Rangers men', then on the other hand he's obliged to write some more controversial shit-stirring stuff on behalf of the paper. When you look back at his articles over the past couple of years though, it's not easy to buy into the idea that everything being written about us in that paper is anti-Rangers drivel written on behalf of Celtic fans, so it kinda blows some of our support's anti-Record stuff right out of the water. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 half that reputations based on them outing whyte. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.