der Berliner 3,247 Posted May 26, 2014 Share Posted May 26, 2014 Sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming lalalala with eyes tight shut doesn't alter the fact that we either don't have 1.5 million in the bank of cleared funds or are in breach of contract. Alas I excel at writing with my nose with eyes shut. So you by default exclude the option that the club, Easdale and Letham have since spoken about the pay-back rate? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 26, 2014 Share Posted May 26, 2014 Alas I excel at writing with my nose with eyes shut. So you by default exclude the option that the club, Easdale and Letham have since spoken about the pay-back rate? given the article. yes of course i do. i also exclude the notion that smaug rose from his lair in the lonely mountain and paid them back with stolen dwarf gold. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted May 26, 2014 Share Posted May 26, 2014 According to the "contract" quoted......the club can ONLY Repay the loans using ST money of shares. Are they not allowed to use cash from ANY other funding source? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 26, 2014 Share Posted May 26, 2014 According to the "contract" quoted......the club can ONLY Repay the loans using ST money of shares. Are they not allowed to use cash from ANY other funding source? no the contract says from a variety of sources. as soon as we have 1.5 million in the bank it must be repaid. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 26, 2014 Share Posted May 26, 2014 “6.1.2 a placing or rights issue or other form of debt or equity fundraising of the Company or any member of the Rangers Group; or 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,247 Posted May 26, 2014 Share Posted May 26, 2014 no the contract says from a variety of sources. as soon as we have 1.5 million in the bank it must be repaid. Well, we'll sooner or later will know whether those who agreed to that contract have come to a new agreement about the pay back date ... no matter what was originally written. (And will tell the stock market about it in due course.) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 26, 2014 Share Posted May 26, 2014 Well, we'll sooner or later will know whether those who agreed to that contract have come to a new agreement about the pay back date ... no matter what was originally written. (And will tell the stock market about it in due course.) You mean you think they are deceiving shareholders and breaking aim rules. Well it's possible. Wouldn't be a first. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,247 Posted May 26, 2014 Share Posted May 26, 2014 You mean you think they are deceiving shareholders and breaking aim rules. Well it's possible. Wouldn't be a first. Well, at the end of the day it's an agreement between the club, Letham/Laxey and Easdale. Maybe you know all the ins and outs of stockmarket rules, I'm not sure whether they are breaking any if they are restructuring their deal and tell them in due course. We shall see. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 26, 2014 Share Posted May 26, 2014 Well, at the end of the day it's an agreement between the club, Letham/Laxey and Easdale. Maybe you know all the ins and outs of stockmarket rules, I'm not sure whether they are breaking any if they are restructuring their deal and tell them in due course. We shall see. Get your money on smaug 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.