"Self Absorbed" Stan Need Not Apply

[D'Artagnan 173]

I suspect the sectarian charities in Scotland are less than enamoured by Stan Collymore’s intrusion into the sectarian debate in Scotland. In fact anyone who possesses of grain of genuine desire to tackle this problem will realise it’s a subject which requires both a delicate and balanced approach if we are to get onside both sides of the Old Firm divide, some of whom have genuine concerns about their right to expression of culture and race.

 

What we do not need is the debate being driven by someone whose own hypocrisy and conduct undermines that debate. Not only did Collymore commit a domestic assault on Ulrika Johnson, but the latter claims he also threatened to kill her. This of course is not the first time Collymore has been the subject of such allegations:

 

http://www.dailymail…d-wife-row.html

 

Of course Ms Johnsson’s problems with Collymore didn’t end there as she had to seek a court order preventing Collymore offering for public sale, a video of their previous intimate encounters:

 

http://www.scotsman….le-ban-1-863032

 

Perhaps this latter course of action should have prepared us somewhat for his next unedifying course of conduct:

 

http://news.sky.com/…gging-sex-shame

 

“He is very apologetic, he is very remorseful, but he has to move on.

 

“I hope the public at large will realise that Stan has made mistakes but that fundamentally he is not a bad egg and he is not an evil individual.”

 

That statement would perhaps have carried greater authority had it not been issued following Collymore having been caught by Sun reporters, quite literally, with his pants down.

 

And I’m sure the various victims of his trail of carnage including violence and threatening behaviour would argue that Stan is considerably worse than a “bad egg” and “not an evil individual”. Anyone spiteful enough to offer for sale an intimate sex video for the purpose of humiliating a female they have battered senseless should be utterly ashamed to try and even mount the high horse called “moral”.

 

But not Collymore. Perhaps this Telegraph article sums it up perfectly.

 

http://www.telegraph…-obsession.html

 

Collymore calls “foul” when his own behaviour lets him down. He is not averse to laying the blame elsewhere to cover up his own shortcomings – particularly where there is no intimate sex video to release in order to extract vengeance.

 

http://www.telegraph…reet-brawl.html

 

http://www.telegraph…allegation.html

 

Therefore it should come as no surprise that Collymore’s latest allegation against Rangers supporters made courtesy of twitter are both erroneous and false.

 

 

I would take issue with the Rangers supporters singing this song however. I would suggest referring to Mr Collymore as a “wife beating bastard” is wholly inaccurate.

 

He is a lot worse than that, and someone Scotland does not need to be driving the debate on sectarianism.

Edited February 21, 2015 by D'Artagnan

[The Real PapaBear 0]

The question that has not yet been asked, and it has perhaps not been asked because it is so blindingly obvious, is why is this degenerate clown even on radio or TV anyway?

Anyone who is able to suffer his braying Brummie whine for any length of time (and if you can, you're a better man than I) will be left in no doubt that he is noth there for his analytical skills, which are, at best, bland.

 

This, let us never forget, is a practicioner of domestic violence, a man who batters women - the lowest form of life other than a child abuser.

 

The fact that he is also an adulterer and a sexual degenerate is no reason for him not to present a sports show, but they sure as hell are reasons for keeping his mouth shut on any topic of morality.

[aweebluesoandso 290]

Stan's demons are two fold, he is a failed footballer and a failed Lover. Ulrika confessed to faking climax with Stan during their love making, Stan couldn't score on the pitch or in the bedroom, that's got to hurt. Something that's never happened to our own Super Ally, I always thought Ally got the nickname Super for his goalscoring prowess, maybe there's more to that than meets the eye?

Edited February 21, 2015 by aweebluesoandso

[pete 2,499]

He is having a field day on twitter. He obviously has plenty of support from the manky mob. He also seems to think playing a flute is sectarian well I am sure James Galway would give him a discussion on that one.

[Laudbertz 0]

He also seems to think playing a flute is sectarian well I am sure James Galway would give him a discussion on that one.

 

And Ron Burgundy