aweebluesoandso 290 Posted October 29, 2015 Author Share Posted October 29, 2015 How difficult could it be for the SOS to organise on match days, a human Bear barrier outside the Megastore, asking fellow Bears to boycott the store? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 I'm always disappointed at the number of fans wearing the current strip that you see in the stands. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 How difficult could it be for the SOS to organise on match days, a human Bear barrier outside the Megastore, asking fellow Bears to boycott the store? The store stands on land owned by the club. There have been previous instances of police and stewards on instruction of the club being used to move fans out of the area on to public land. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,325 Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 How difficult could it be for the SOS to organise on match days, a human Bear barrier outside the Megastore, asking fellow Bears to boycott the store? Not sure whether directly asking for a boycott may get SOS into trouble. But if they were e.g. "simply" telling people that a mere 75p of every 10 pounds spend actually end up with the club, it would be up with the people willing to enter to make their minds up for themselves ... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted October 29, 2015 Author Share Posted October 29, 2015 (edited) The store stands on land owned by the club. There have been previous instances of police and stewards on instruction of the club being used to move fans out of the area on to public land. They couldn't stop the SOS (marches i was on) from parading from the Copland rear to the front doors in Edmiston Drive. So i can't see them stopping (with a supporters partisan board) them from protesting outside the Megastore? Edited October 29, 2015 by aweebluesoandso 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 They couldn't stop the SOS (marches i was on) from parading from the Copland rear to the front doors in Edmiston Drive. So i can't see them stopping (with a supporters partisan board) them from protesting outside the Megastore? I was with the SOS march too. There were other protests where fans were moved on. But you misunderstand what I was on about. Partisan board or not I am almost certain there will be clauses in the retail contract allowing penalties against the club if they were seen to be acting against the interest of retail sales. Permitting a blockage of a retail outlet would seem to me to be doing exactly that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted October 29, 2015 Author Share Posted October 29, 2015 I was with the SOS march too. There were other protests where fans were moved on. But you misunderstand what I was on about. Partisan board or not I am almost certain there will be clauses in the retail contract allowing penalties against the club if they were seen to be acting against the interest of retail sales. Permitting a blockage of a retail outlet would seem to me to be doing exactly that. Probably so boabie, they board may put on a small show of trying to disperse any protest, but it depends on how forceful the police want to be. I was right a the Edminston front doors the night we played the abandoned Hearts game, it got heated for a wee while but we prevailed and made our feeling known,. We can still rise now and be the support again, that stood against them, the corrupt **** army and sent them homeward tae think again lol 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,483 Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Rangers told they have no hope of striking compromise deal with Mike Ashley over Sports Direct contract RANGERS were last night warned they have virtually no chance of reaching an amicable agreement with Mike Ashley and Sports Direct over their “onerous” seven year merchandising contract. Dave King, the Rangers chairman, issued a strongly-worded statement following a board meeting at Ibrox on Tuesday accusing Sports Direct of “poor business practices” and “corporate governance failures”. King, who assumed control at the Championship club following the EGM he requisitioned back in March, also vowed the sports goods company will be “held accountable legally and financially”. The previous regime at Ibrox agreed to a long-term deal which the Rangers Supporters Trust has calculated nets the Glasgow club only 75p for every £10 which is spent. That situation has led to widespread unhappiness among the Rangers support and to large numbers of disgruntled fans refusing to buy replica jerseys and official club products. King and his associates have been unable to arrive at a compromise with Sports Direct – despite vowing to greatly increase the number of strips the nationwide chain of stores sells if they do – at a series of meetings since seizing power. Michael Martin, a board member at the Newcastle United Supporters Trust and the editor of the True Faith fanzine, is highly doubtful Rangers will be able to negotiate with the enigmatic billionaire in the future. “I desperately hope that Rangers supporters get a hold of their club and get to run it the way they want to run it,” said Martin. “But I would be staggered if Rangers made any headway in changing the deal. “You would think that he (Ashley) would want to keep supporters onside so they buy his products, but that is not really his character. He isn’t even interested in keeping his own shareholders at Sports Direct onside. That is his character. His policy seems to be ‘my way or the highway’. “I think it will come down to whoever blinks first with the legal bills, Sports Direct or Rangers. But he has got unlimited funds to fight those actions whereas Rangers are desperate for commercial income so they can compete with Celtic again. “The thing is, for the amount of money involved at Rangers, it is quite small in the scale of his fortune. This guy is making his money out of sport, but seems to hate the nature of it.” An almost identical situation exists at Newcastle United, the struggling English Premier League club which Ashley owns, to the one at Rangers. Newcastle supporters are deeply unhappy with the terms of a commercial deal about which few details are known publicly and are refusing to endorse official club merchandise in in the same high numbers as they did in the past. “During Ashley’s tenure as Newcastle owner our commercial income has fallen year on year,” said Martin. “It has risen in the last couple of years because of the controversial shirt sponsorship deal he has done with Wonga.com. But that has subsequently led to a huge drop in the amount of merchandise they sell. “I have been going to St. James’s Park more times than I care to mention and I live on Tyneside. Ten years ago, every third person had a Newcastle United strip on. Now they’re not so popular. I would put that down to the deal with Wonga.com. “In terms of the merchandising, there is an online deal with a company which has been set up called NUFCDirect.com. That is run from Shirebrook where Sports Direct’s headquarters are. Because Newcastle United isn’t a public limited company we can’t really find out who gets what. “We are shy of detail on that. The managing director, Lee Charnley, has said that it’s a great deal for Newcastle. But he would say that wouldn’t he?” Martin added: “St. James’ Park is absolutely plastered with Sports Direct advertising. It is unavoidable. It is all over the training ground as well. Anywhere there might be a photograph taken or a camera rolling. “For all of that, Newcastle United gets the princely sum of absolutely nothing. He gets free advertising across the country, possibly across the world because the Premier League is the most watched league in the world. “To add some balance, it has to be noted that he does have quite a large (£129 million) loan to Newcastle which is interest free. The club claim that the free advertising he gets is offset by the lack of interest payments. But that isn’t the act of somebody who wants to build up a football club is it? You should be wanting to get advertising in.” The widespread disillusionment with how Newcastle is being run and the falling revenue from merchandising hasn't, however, resulted in either Ashley or Sports Direct amending their business plan or acting with greater transparency. “We are banging our heads against a brick wall,” said Martin. “The Newcastle United Supporters Trust is one of the few members-only fans’ groups. It is very well organised and very well connected and is unsurprisingly banned from attending the fans’ forum with the club. It is a box ticking exercise. “The reason why he is hanging onto the club is because of the TV deals. The value of Newcastle United increases every time one of these deals is struck. He has got an asset that is appreciating in value. All he needs to do is keep it in the Premier League. He doesn't want to invest and make us particularly successful. “He wants players to come into the club who can be given a polish, put in the shop window and sold. That seems to be the policy of the club. There isn’t a manager. There is just a guy who trains the players as they come in and go out of the football club. To all intents and purposes it isn’t a football club. “Rangers are in a much better position than Newcastle because he doesn’t have control and he can be fought.” http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/13902636.Rangers_told_they_have_no_hope_of_striking_compromise_deal_with_Mike_Ashley_over_Sports_Direct_contract/?ref=mr&lp=1 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.