craig 5,199 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Same as usual please folks : Foderingham Tavernier Alves Cardoso Hodson Candeias Jack Dorrans Windass Miller Morelos Subs : Herrera Wilson Pena Beaton 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,320 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Same as usual please folks : Foderingham 4 Tavernier 5 Alves 6 Cardoso. 3 Hodson. 3 Candeias. 4 Jack. 4 Dorrans. 6 Windass. 5 Miller. 1 (don't know what for but didn't want to give 0) Morelos. 6 Subs : Herrera. 6 Wilson. 6 Pena. 3 Beaton . 0 PC. 3 Sent us out well up for it but made bad decisions as game went on, and failure to lambast Beaton in post-match was cowardly. We only played good football for about 15 mins, then got carried away with the refs cheating and never focused on our own game. This is reflected in my scores. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Bear 518 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Foderingham 5 Tavernier 5 Alves 6 Cardoso 6 Hodson 5 Candeias 5 Jack 5 Dorrans 6 Windass 5 Miller 5 Morelos 6 Subs : Herrera 5 Wilson 5 Pena 5 Beaton - as a competent referee 0 but certain people may say he played a blinder. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 . 0 PC. 3 Sent us out well up for it but made bad decisions as game went on, and failure to lambast Beaton in post-match was cowardly. We only played good football for about 15 mins, then got carried away with the refs cheating and never focused on our own game. This is reflected in my scores. Why don't you just leave Millers name out rather than put a stupid rating in, he wasn't any worse than most of the players so your ratings are purely personal. He should never have been put in midfield after the sending off but that wasn't his fault. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 After the sending off I only thought Alves played decent the rest were poor, no effort really and subs and tactics were poor by the manager. Foderingham 5 Tavernier 5 Alves 6 Cardoso. 4 Hodson. 3 Candeias. 5 Jack. 4 Dorrans. 3 Windass. 3 Miller. 5 Morelos. 6 Subs : Herrera. 4 Wilson. 4 Pena. 4 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 when we went a man down the team ceased operating as a unit that was the problem rather than individuals playing poorly 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 when we went a man down the team ceased operating as a unitthat was the problem rather than individuals playing poorly Players need to give more if possible in these situations, I don't think many did, this is down to the individuals IMO. Some players hid out there after we went a man down not good enough. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Dynamo 128 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I thought the way Morelos was throwing himself about in the first half, he was on a mission to get himself sent off. He was lucky to just get booked. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 13,750 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Whereas Jack was unlucky to get sent off and Stokes, McGeough and Livko should've all received bookings or sendings off. We were not very good yesterday. We should beat a newly promoted team with 10 men. Only Dorrans gets pass marks for me and I'm sure Rossiter will be extremely disappointed to not feature. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Players need to give more if possible in these situations, I don't think many did, this is down to the individuals IMO. Some players hid out there after we went a man down not good enough. looks like there was no contingency plan for a situation when we're a man down....should there have been ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.