rbr 1,247 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Dave King is no where near the standard that is required of a Rangers Chairman , personally I wish he would do the decent thing and go . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Desmond actually owns more than 30 percent. This isnt a big deal. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 (edited) Dave King is no where near the standard that is required of a Rangers Chairman , personally I wish he would do the decent thing and go . he saved us....piling money in after losing £20 million under Murray I'm happy with the guy and this whole thing was started by Ashley's placeman after being ousted Edited October 12, 2017 by colinstein 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
union 0 Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 Dave King is no where near the standard that is required of a Rangers Chairman , personally I wish he would do the decent thing and go . common sense won’t go down well here, king is and always has been a wrong un, some folk wish to repeat the whyte scenario all over again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
union 0 Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/15593424.Dave_King_faces_being_ordered_to_pay___11_million_to_complete_his_takeover_of_Rangers/ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 common sense won’t go down well here, king is and always has been a wrong un, some folk wish to repeat the whyte scenario all over again. Whatever else Dave King is, I don't think he's a Craig Whyte. However, while things have obviously stabilised under his tenure, I doubt if King has the nouse to take us where we'd all like to be. By far the biggest concern to me is the continued fragmentation of the clubs share ownership and the difficulty this poses to any meaningful future share issue. It's one thing getting rid of the Greens, Ashleys, etc (and that was much needed) but it's another thing taking the club on to a genuinely secure financial footing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 At worst he can be forced to offer 11 million for complete control. Lots of people wont take him up on the deal. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 At worst he can be forced to offer 11 million for complete control. Lots of people wont take him up on the deal. that's it.....he'll be a £million out setting up a 20P share offer which won't be taken up.....you would think the COS would not order such futility 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 At worst he can be forced to offer 11 million for complete control. Lots of people wont take him up on the deal. I happen to agree it's a pointless exercise by the TOP , but it is what it is and could have been avoided but it's just more poor headlines for us . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
union 0 Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 At worst he can be forced to offer 11 million for complete control. Lots of people wont take him up on the deal. At worse he can pull his SA stunt and ignore the court ruling, that would be a very bad move on his part, his own Advocate said in court that would be a criminal offence. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.