Super_Ally 0 Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 Daniel Cousin (born February 2, 1977 in Libreville) is a French-Gabonese football striker. He currently plays for RC Lens, a club to which he moved from Le Mans Union Club 72 in the summer of 2004. He has played international matches for Gabon. Full name: Daniel Cousin Date of birth: February 02, 1977 Birthplace: Libreville, Gabon Nationality: Gabonese 2nd nationality: French EU passport: Yes Height: 187 cm Weight: 82 kg Club: Lens Position: Striker [C] Number: 9 Previous clubs: Martigues > Niort > Le Mans > Lens International debut: Caps: 0 Goals: 0 World cups: none Season Club Country Level GP GS 2006-07 Lens FRA A 30 4 2005-06 Lens FRA A 33 13 2004-05 Lens FRA A 37 9 2003-04 Le Mans FRA A 33 11 2002-03 Le Mans FRA B 33 15 2001-02 Le Mans FRA B 33 12 2000-01 Le Mans FRA B 29 6 1999-00 Niort FRA B 24 4 1998-99 Niort FRA B 22 1 1997-98 Martigues FRA B 36 5 Career Totals: 310 80 From a poster on FF. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza_8 233 Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 Aye just read the thread on FF. Sounds a bit of a joke signing TBH. 80 goals in 310 appearances is shite for a striker! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest burnbankblue Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 Aye just read the thread on FF. Sounds a bit of a joke signing TBH. 80 goals in 310 appearances is shite for a striker! Good news for ya then. http://www.transfermarketweb.com/?action=read&idsel=974 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ascender 352 Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 So we can't afford to pay Killie the 1.5M up front they want for Naismith, but we're going to pay 1.4M for a foreign player we've never heard of? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 Still dont understand why a striker is top priority. We could always be done with 1 more but with Sionko leaving we are double short on the right and Buffel still isnt fit for the creative role. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 I think we have plenty of cover for the striking positions. In reading Lee McCulloch's interview on sporting life it seems that he is set to play on the right side of midfield this year Gribz - Burke will be an able back up to McCulloch and then on the left we will have Beasley and Adam. I think our squad looks reasonably strong, if not exciting. Buffel, if fit and applying himself, could fill the creative role - could Burke be trained for that role too, or is he just too lightweight ? I felt he looked good coming in off the flanks last season, but was too inconsistent. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 I think we have plenty of cover for the striking positions. In reading Lee McCulloch's interview on sporting life it seems that he is set to play on the right side of midfield this year Gribz - Burke will be an able back up to McCulloch and then on the left we will have Beasley and Adam. I think our squad looks reasonably strong, if not exciting. Buffel, if fit and applying himself, could fill the creative role - could Burke be trained for that role too, or is he just too lightweight ? I felt he looked good coming in off the flanks last season, but was too inconsistent. Yip we are fine upfront for number IMO, Sebo and Novo can play big parts. Surprising that McCulloch was brought in as RM, but fair enough if he can do a job there. He can always move upfront or left if need be. And of course we still have Gow and Buffel to come into things. The question is who gives way to a creative player in the XI? I think Smith would take Darcheville out but hopefully not as I expect him to be a menace to SPL defences. THANK FOOK THE FOOTY IS BACK 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 Yip we are fine upfront for number IMO, Sebo and Novo can play big parts. Surprising that McCulloch was brought in as RM, but fair enough if he can do a job there. He can always move upfront or left if need be. And of course we still have Gow and Buffel to come into things. The question is who gives way to a creative player in the XI? I think Smith would take Darcheville out but hopefully not as I expect him to be a menace to SPL defences. THANK FOOK THE FOOTY IS BACK To bring a creative mid in I see WS dropping a forward and going with a 4-2-3-1 - personally I would prefer to see Ferguson/Hemdani or Thomson benched for a creative midfielder and staying with a 4-4-2 with the creative midfielder breaking from the mid. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 To bring a creative mid in I see WS dropping a forward and going with a 4-2-3-1 - personally I would prefer to see Ferguson/Hemdani or Thomson benched for a creative midfielder and staying with a 4-4-2 with the creative midfielder breaking from the mid. Yeah thats my choice aswell. Its a tough one between ferguson and Hemdani as ferguson gets about a bit more but Hemdani was class last season and sits infront of the back 4 and strolls games. Only downside is he doesnt get stuck into tackles so much. But at the moment Hemdani edges it ahead of Ferguson as a starter. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 Sebo and Novo can play big parts. I was right - They are the chaps who just beat Chelsea 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.