craig 5,199 Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 Yes but the Celtic and Barca games were without Boyd but also without Sebo. If you think we would have got the same type of result using Sebo then I would be astounded. We maybe do look like a team with 10 players with Boyd in the team - but we looked exactly the same when Sebo played - he was shite !! Boyd had at least one thing going for him that Sebo didn't, and doesn't - Boyd can score goals - and as a striker I think that is a pretty important aspect to the game. Buffel just flatters to deceive IMO - vert skilful but either not suited to the Scottish game or just not interested when subjected to a stiff tackle. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 But with Boyd, this is where i have been misunderstood. Ok i dont rate Boyds work rate but im looking at the team overall. When Boyd plays it takes a player out the team who is going to work for us and its like playing with 10 men. Yes he gets goals but its a team game and we need 11 players all over the park to do the business for us. We have played Boyd for the last 2 seasons and won jack shit and played shit. So being our top scorer in the both seasons he has been here (1 may I add being half a season) is like playing with 10 men? I honestly can't see how this is Boyds fault If it wasn't for boyd IMO we would've been in much a worse state in the past few seasons than we already were, where were the goals going to come from apart from Boyd IMO you don't win anything with only 11 workers on the pitch, I would rather have a poacher who scores with someone to work alongside him than 2 running all the pitch for 90 mins. if Boyd had it all he wouldn't be at Ibrox.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.