Devil's advocaat 1,884 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Uilleam said: Issame Charaï , I presume. Assistant Manager on a 2.5 year contract, or thereby. No, Thelwell. Charai situation is an odd one, was wheeled out along with the other 4 when Clement left, then promptly disappeared again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sutton_blows_goats 6,319 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Just now, Devil's advocaat said: No, Thelwell. Charai situation is an odd one, was wheeled out along with the other 4 when Clement left, then promptly disappeared again. Think he is just here to fluff Igamane's pillow. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 6,512 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 1 minute ago, Devil's advocaat said: No, Thelwell. Charai situation is an odd one, was wheeled out along with the other 4 when Clement left, then promptly disappeared again. Maybe he is working from home? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 6,512 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Just now, Sutton_blows_goats said: Think he is just here to fluff Igamane's pillow. Well, he has a contract for c3.5 years. Maybe the plan (not a word we often associate with the Club, I concede) was to attract talent from the Maghreb, and from the Maghrebi diaspora, in Europe. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graeme Ro55 1,142 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, Bluedell said: Everyone is positive about a bright future under our new owners. It would be a massive own goal to go back 7 years and reappoint Gerrard. There's nothing new about that. I'm not positive about the takeover, but I'm not outright negative. I am dubious concerning the motivations of VC types, and how they might go about earning from their investment. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 6,219 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, buster. said: A question, who is signing off on the decision for a new manager? What level of input do the present boardroom have, compared to those who haven't yet taken over (51%) ? The new owners would be calling the shots. The current board won't be able to do anything major without their say. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 6,219 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, Graeme Ro55 said: I'm not positive about the takeover, but I'm not outright negative. I am dubious concerning the motivations of VC types, and how they might go about earning from their investment. Agreed that VC would normally make me nervous, but they seem to be fairly good owners for Leeds, so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt at the moment. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 8,040 Posted 3 hours ago Author Share Posted 3 hours ago Thinking back Gerrard managed the team that won 55 if it had been an election he’d have a landslide but don’t forget the other mob were in terminal meltdown at that time so you have to ask could Gerrard be a better manager than Rodger’s given that the Parkhead lot are miles ahead at the moment does Gerrard have the balls for a fight I doubt it . 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bluedell 6,219 Posted 2 hours ago Popular Post Share Posted 2 hours ago A post from a FF administrator in orange font saying it's Gerrard. 🫤 That usually means it's 100% certain. If so, I'm totally underwhelmed and the excitement of new owners has quickly dissipated. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil's advocaat 1,884 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago FollowFollow forum* seem to have gone all in on SG being the man. * Yeah, I know. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.