buster. 5,653 Posted Monday at 19:03 Share Posted Monday at 19:03 (edited) 1 hour ago, Uilleam said: I sense, somehow, that Mr Cavenagh does not seek, nor need, the comfort of cosplay; that he neither seeks, nor needs, the comfort of victimhood; ..... His day job tends to lead to his comfort, often at the expense of victims. Concerning himself with moral issues isn't his bag. Maybe Darth Vader isn't so far off the mark 😂 Edited Monday at 19:04 by buster. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,653 Posted Monday at 19:08 Share Posted Monday at 19:08 59 minutes ago, L72 said: They don't care. They are often on the wrong side of history and the victim mentality is so deeply set that they see no wrong in anything to do with their clubs name. That was the whole point during their coverup of touching weans, protecting the "good" name of celtic they said, that was the priority. They are Hamas advocating, Hezbollah touting, ira sympathising, nonce supporting bastards. They aren't on the wrong side of history regards what is currently happening in Gaza. Supporting the murdering of many thousands of innocent children is the wrong side. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 6,470 Posted Monday at 19:13 Share Posted Monday at 19:13 8 minutes ago, buster. said: His day job tends to lead to his comfort, often at the expense of victims. Concerning himself with moral issues isn't his bag. Explain, please. But, do be careful that you don't move into libelling the man. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Uilleam 6,470 Posted Monday at 19:16 Popular Post Share Posted Monday at 19:16 6 minutes ago, buster. said: They aren't on the wrong side of history regards what is currently happening in Gaza. I don't think that hating Jews, because they are Jews, puts them on the right side of anything, far less history. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 4,833 Posted Monday at 20:03 Share Posted Monday at 20:03 Oh dear. Not again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaBoy 2,521 Posted Monday at 20:11 Share Posted Monday at 20:11 8 hours ago, L72 said: Imagine being one of the officers that had to go over to Ibrox today to seize a massive picture of Graeme Souness shirtless. The plod are mindless imbeciles in the main. They don't think, they are told what to do. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,978 Posted Monday at 20:12 Share Posted Monday at 20:12 That might be the last of these type of tifos we’ll see at Ibrox the new owners might change things 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaBoy 2,521 Posted Monday at 20:13 Share Posted Monday at 20:13 2 hours ago, Uilleam said: ...declared the banner to be 'unacceptable'. He did not, of course, explain what was 'unacceptable' about it. He really is a mealy mouthed sack of shit. Of that, there is really no doubt. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
L72 263 Posted Monday at 20:39 Share Posted Monday at 20:39 The wee wannabe terrorist is cute and a joke to all but a banner of a shotgun??!!! Fucking unacceptable. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,653 Posted Monday at 21:46 Share Posted Monday at 21:46 2 hours ago, Uilleam said: Explain, please. But, do be careful that you don't move into libelling the man. How he made his money isn't a secret and I'm guessing you already know. There isn't a law against it but neither is there a law against having an opinion on it, yet. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.