aweebluesoandso

Resolution12 was a Frankenstein monster, the haters gathered up many inaccurate pieces of information and put it together into a cadaver. No matter how many times they cried It's alive, It's alive, or passed the monster around for others to instill life into their creation, their monster resolutely refused to draw breath. RIP again to the Frankenstein Monster.

Promenade hotel Funchal Madeira. No Tims anywhere thankfully.

I was taught to be cautious.

let's just say a few Apron strings where pulled to get this resolution12 pish buried. A brother in my lodge is a past master of lodge Berne 1872, that's how it works, you scratch my bare knee and i'll scratch yours, so moat it be.

AWBSAS tuning in from Madeira, boa noite Bears.

I'm away got a plane to catch at seven in the morning, Madeira here i come. I'll tune in from holiday.

Way back in the day there was a split in the league attendance money i'm sure?

I agree Craig, we need change at the top. Agitating for these clubs to make the changes has to be done, that statement was one way, no harm in having a wee dig at their gripping at the same time though eh?

It's never been a level playing field since the days of the two teams splitting the money in the home attendance figures. Since rhen it's been dog eat dog .

It's got everything to do with the way we were treated before, how can they say they don't need us, then now complain when they think they're not getting enough of our money? If you can't see the link, then it's because you don't want to see it.

What you don't see hypocrisy at work when one of the clubs that voted us out the SPL, with language like ''We don't need them'' now then complains they are not getting enough games against us?

They've had plenty to say about us in the recent past, that's my point. When we see hypocrisy at work from any of them from now on, we should not be afraid to point it out,. Whether or not that hypocrisy is directed at us, or just any general hatred, jealousy or hypocrisy. Silence is not an option from now on, we are attacked in someway almost daily, time to do some attacking of our own imo.

Are we forgetting every club and their fans, always have something to say about our club. No matter what we do some bitter twat be it a fan or director of another club has a pop at us. But we are not allowed to turn the tables on them? If clubs are being hypercritical, snide or jealous, we should always ram it back down their throats. To long has the dignified silence bit our arses, who gives a monkey's whether these clubs are disadvantaged by not playing us a cartain number of times, We should not be afraid to say that

Scottish football is riven with petty jealously and hatred , as a result I don't want hear, see or talk about other clubs if i can help it, they are quite literally hating the game up here to death. I now only want to see Rangers play at Ibrox, i have no interest in giving my money to other clubs. It's sad but it is what it is, my only hope is my club can survive this death race, hopefully abandon ship somewhere sometime, before we go down with the sinking ship

An attack dog imo, as long as they allow his bite to be worse than his bark.

I don't believe the Rhecord all of the time, welcome back btw.

So MW signs Barton, Rossiter, Crooks, Windass, Ball and then walks away from the club? MW comes across as honest man of his word, he's sold the Rangers resurgence idea, and himself to these players. I don't think he'll go back on his word.

'' if you wait by the river long enough, the bodies of your enemies will float by'' Sun Tzu

https://exposingtherhats.wordpress.com/

Ashley was claiming MASH and himself were separate entities. Also his interest in Newcastle United where not linked, Lord Brodie agreed with the SFA in that Ashley in loaning Rangers money and nominating directors (Lliambias) in RIFC plc, he MASH/Ashley broke the SFA rules, in that he did therefore have influences in two clubs. He can't claim that now, if we are claiming in any subsequent court case Ashley had influence through MASH to the merchandise contract surely?

The club has a legal ruling nailing Ashley to the retail merchandise deal at Rangers and Newcastle, dual influence?

url]http://stv.tv/news/west-central/1357022-mike-ashley-loses-court-fight-over-scottish-fa-fine/[/url] Mike Ashley loses court fight over Scottish FA fine Mike Ashley has failed in a court fight over a fine imposed by the Scottish Football Association over his influence at Rangers. The businessman had sought a judicial review over the decision of the governing body to levy the £1000 sanction, claiming an error in law had been made. MASH Holdings Limited, of which Ashley is the 100% shareholder, entered a credit facility arrangement with Rangers in October 2014. As part of the conditions of the loan, his associate Derek Llambias was nominated and subsequently appointed as a director of Rangers International Football Club plc and its subsidiary Rangers Football Club Limited. Ashley is forbidden under the rules of the SFA from having influence over Rangers beyond his 9% shareholding because of his majority stake in English Championship club Newcastle United. A judicial panel ruled he had breached those rules as a result of MASH loaning Rangers money. In his opinion, Lord Brodie agreed with the view of the SFA's compliance officer that Ashley, through MASH, had through the "very granting of the right to nominate directors in and of itself gave rise to the possibility of the petitioner influencing the affairs of two clubs".

Sorry there Bears, got caught in the crossfire haha

]Mike Ashley loses court fight over Scottish FA fine Grant Russell Grant Russell an hour ago The businessman claimed the governing body had made an 'error of law' over his influence at Rangers. Mike Ashley: Lost his latest fight with the Scottish FA. Mike Ashley: Lost his latest fight with the Scottish FA. Richard Sellers / PA Archive/PA Images Mike Ashley has failed in a court fight over a fine imposed by the Scottish Football Association over his influence at Rangers. The businessman had sought a judicial review over the decision of the governing body to levy the £1000 sanction, claiming an error in law had been made. MASH Holdings Limited, of which Ashley is the 100% shareholder, entered a credit facility arrangement with Rangers in October 2014. As part of the conditions of the loan, his associate Derek Llambias was nominated and subsequently appointed as a director of Rangers International Football Club plc and its subsidiary Rangers Football Club Limited. Ashley is forbidden under the rules of the SFA from having influence over Rangers beyond his 9% shareholding because of his majority stake in English Championship club Newcastle United. A judicial panel ruled he had breached those rules as a result of MASH loaning Rangers money. In his opinion, Lord Brodie agreed with the view of the SFA's compliance officer that Ashley, through MASH, had through the "very granting of the right to nominate directors in and of itself gave rise to the possibility of the petitioner influencing the affairs of two clubs".

Ashley loses latest battle with King and the SFA. updates to follow.