forlanssister

I don't know what they say I didn't visit their site, the c&p and the link are to a .sg page

Some people need to give themselves a slap with the reality stick. Ngs' statement re ECWC was in my opinion crass, stupid, ignorant and totally unnecessary, it was a classic own goal. It was designed to prove his Rangers credentials but all it has done is bring suspicion upon them. It's the stuff we ridicule virtually every foreign Tim signing for! If you think I'm the only one who questions the sincerity of the claim then read this. I'll pass on this opportunity to respond to my very own Arthur Richard Jackson.

This one was always going to bite him on the arse it was an act of gross stupidity, needs to give his PR guy a boot in the baws. Is Bill Ng lying about his Rangers heritage? Bill Ng recently spoke about his love for Rangers FC, claiming that he was not getting involved with the club for alternative reasons but because he was a fan and in love with the club. The Singapore businessman made claims in an interview with Scottish newspaper The Daily Record that he watched Rangers lift the European Cup Winners Cup in 1972. However, a quick google search from Twitter user @CelticResearch shows that the game wasnâ??t even available to watch in Singapore. The image below shows the TV listings in Singapore on the day of the match and the European Cup Winners Cup tie is not listed at all. Despite this, Bill Ng still believes he is the right man to run Rangers FC: â??We want to show that weâ??re not just the type of owners who go in with no understanding and are in it for the money. â??We will install a board of directors made up of Scottish businessmen who support the club. My mission will be accomplished when another young boy watches Rangers lift a European trophy.â? Should that ever happen, perhaps the young boy will be able to watch it this time. http://www.justsports.com.sg/2012/04/12/is-bill-ng-lying-about-his-rangers-heritage/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=is-bill-ng-lying-about-his-rangers-heritage

Who's saying the outcome won't be known before we exit administration it's not simply a case of the administrators accepting an offer and that's it.

All the more reason for the administrators to accelerate rather than stall the process, it's apparent that the interests of all the prospective buyers would be served by bringing a conclusion sooner or later.

See posts #7 #8 & #9:whistle:

Pioneer Park?

Agreed, you would think this would be an incentive to accelerate any potential deal not stop one in its' tracks.

I may or may not have a personal or business interest though but I won't know till I know who they are. I wholeheartedly agree re questioning the BK's there are many,many questions I would like to see them answer. As I've said before I'd like to see the same standards applied to the 3 bids.

Looks like they have some scepticism in Duff & Phelps too.

Don't for one minute expect each and every question to be answered but I do expect the alleged "Rangers businessmen" they intend to be placed on the board to be revealed and I reserve my right to write to any of their current employers to potentially complain and to make public the results if I feel the need arises.

My motive is a level playing field, let the same standards apply to each bid. I have no personal interest vested or otherwise in any of the 3 bids other than a desire to avoid the winding up of Rangers Football Club plc.

Questions were asked on this board about another of the bidders surely in the interests of fairness the same questions should be asked of any and all bidders?

So we're no more the wiser who the consortium members are, how much they are investing or who they intend to place on the board so basically it's "Trust me".

And why aren't they being revealed? How much is each member contributing?

Frankie ‏ @GersnetOnline Reply Retweet Favorite · Open Craig Whyte/Ticketus: Our advisers have spoken with both parties. #rfcng Looks like it BK's and Bill Ng that he's spoken with then.

Ok thanks. I'm with chilledbear in wanting to know who exactly the "Rangers supporting businessmen" are and what can they bring to Rangers.

Cheers, it was more along the lines of how can we ask a question, got absolutely no desire to join twitter or facebook though I will follow the session through the link on the front page.

How can us non twits participate?

The Scotman confirm one of the parties he's talked with.....

Yes that's my reasoning.

I'd hazard a guess it's Miller he's still to speak with, reasoning being the shareholding is irrelevant as far as Miller would be concerned.

I took it that Ticketus has security over the Group and that this is an attempt to circumvent the possible consequences of that security? also I don't think this one would stand up in court, it has the English equivalent of "gratuitous alienation" written all over it.

Yes it was a couple of weeks back., perhaps Bluedell or BH can explain the inns and outs of it better than I. Before anyone goes screaming "SOURCE? SOURCE?" just think for a second and work it out yourself it's not a secret and there's no attempt to deceive.

He has a debenture in favour of Liberty Corporate I'm not 100% certain that this would not be disallowed by the courts.