GovanAllan

We've all heard the United story they rolled the dice to get the Holy Grail and came up short, then found they were way in over their heads and to slash costs, again exactly what we need at the moment a bit of realism. I wish somebody had told Sir Minty this tale when he tried and failed with the roll of the dice for the CL.

How can he know that if the final total of the monies available is still not known.

So the TBK share issue (don't laugh at the back) would've been doomed as well then, but hold on that was the only way they had to fund the club in the future.

Really keep your mouth shut that the best you can come up with when losing an arguement.

Green went into a club on the brink of the same disaster we are in at the moment, and made it break even exactly what we are asking any future owner to do so why the problem. So he raised 10 Mill of actual money for the club would bit his hand off for that at the moment. If the floatation is aimed just at the fans it will fail miserably we never have or will raise money that way.

TBK never got this much scrutiny.

Can you tell me where TBK had anywhere near that kind of money on their own? They had hee haw and where coming to us to finance them, while including Euro money in a funding plan that we have no chance of getting. It was a jackanory tale from the get go and the only reason it wasn't laughed straight out the door was because they were so called Rangers men, oh and a rugby guy from Edinburgh, ring any bells that one.

And just what are The No Mark Knights going to use for cash Irn-Bru glass cheques. Remember theirs was a bid so full of holes it made a great sieve.

All we've had from a lot on here is we will never see a CVA proposal he's a fake, oh wait is that a CVA proposal I see. Now it's he has no money to fund this it will never be passed. What you going to say if it gets approved? As for the share floatation if he's waiting on Rangers fans buying into this he can forget. When was the last time Rangers fans dug deep on a share floatation?

Don't bother DB you can't have a pop at Admins pet poster, a lot different when he's the one having the pop.

The Rhag telling it like it is, in their world. Tell you one thing if you show me photos of Ibrox & The Meccanodome I know which I would head to, we may need a lick of paint here & there but the other place needs knocked down just for the pain it causes on the eyes.

A fit Lafferty right next to Naismith up front before any of the rest.

Again though Gun without hard facts it's he said this/he said that, IPA at best without hard facts will give them a rap on the knuckles and tell them to tighten up their working practice.

It maybe Gun but that's not the point he's getting chased on, it's that he knew that the money they were lining up with Ticketus was for the purchase not the running costs and even though I don't believe him we can't prove it. There's nothing in Black & White to nail him he knows it and the Beeb know it, but there's also nothing that totally clears him as well, again he knows it and the Beeb know it. So it's stalemate.

Invoices for what? The money from Ticketus he's not arguing that money came from Ticketus he's arguing that he didn't know that it was to be used to buy the club. And whether we believe him or not it can't be proved definately beyond doubt which is something the Beeb don't do very well.

Ok for the last time this will be investigated properly show me where the emails say this money is for the purchase of the club, not what you think it means or what you want it to mean. What it actually says and that is all that will matter when it comes right down to it, and its not in black and white. As for being naive that's up to you mate, I tend to look for hard facts in life when I'm trying to crucify somebody because if you get it wrong you just end up looking like a stupid prick. Show me the hard facts in black & white that shows the money was intended for the purchase and I will hang the bastard myself but it just isn't there. Also if Ticketus had hard facts that Greir knew what was happening don't you think they would be chasing D&P through the courts?

We need every player we have expensive or not if we can't buy anyone.

Again after all the mud throwing just where in all the emails does it say this money is for the purchase of the club? Absolutely no where, so whether any of us think he's lying or not you can't categorically prove he is. End of case come back when you can prove it.

I heard Hateley, Goram & Bomber.

Fine then when we don't show up for a season or two their bank balance will be just fine, or will Milne's personal account be taking a pounding again.

If they had relegated us down a division and kicked us out the cup so be it, that punishment is on the books. But instead they choose to come up with an embargo out of nowhere and keep us in the league out their own self interest. That was the point I was making.

How low can we go? A lot lower going by that performance, I wonder if I or my children will ever see Scotland in a major tournament again I'm beginning to doubt it.

So in a nutshell they didn't have the baws to really throw the book at us and came up with the embargo on the fly. Would be nice to know who actually sat in on the meeting that decided on the embargo, because I don't believe for a minute it was just the 3 who sat on the panel who came up with that idea.

Actually yes that's what I think they did, they were quick enough to show evidence that they had but not one thing on dual contracts, are you working for the beeb because if your not you should be.

Really Phil 3 names must be sitting laughing up his sleeve at a so called Rangers man (don't laugh at the back) doing his best to pull the only viable plan to save the club to bits.