Jump to content

 

 

3909 04

  • Posts

    369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 3909 04

  1. Fine by me. As long as we don't pretend McCoist's inability will be magically cured if the Easdales leave. A dud is a dud.
  2. Monday's debacle had nothing to do with the board, except it highlighted the folly of their over-generous indulgence of Ally's embarrassing incompetence. It would suit some on here for the board to be the recipients of fans' ire, which should be aimed straight at the laughably poor manager.
  3. The documentary poof that fan group leaders, instead of acting in the interests of their members, were in fact acting as cheerleaders for an ex-director who fancied another shot at running the club. The identity of the Tweeter who revealed the story is surely of secondary relevance to the story itself, no?
  4. You're proving my point. You'd sooner discredit the guy who revealed the true story than comment on the incident itself.
  5. Nice amendment, Frankie. It's always good to stay on topic, I find. What was that about deleting social media accounts? Was that aimed at SOS? Not sure what your point is.
  6. Am I? Pray tell, with whom do I hold a grudge and what is my fantasy? Do I imagine I'm a member of VB, is that it? Did I? In what way? You have made some pretty wild allegations on here about me, none of which make any sense. Are you confusing me with someone else?
  7. Nonsense. If irrefutable video evidence emerged of Dave King handing UOF leaders a suitcase full of cash, you would blame Bill McMurdo for blogging about it. The reason people mention the UOF's "alignment" with would-be new owners is because the respective parties are fully and intrexicably aligned.
  8. I'm at home working on top-secret plans to smuggle the directors into the stadium past hordes of furious fans at the AGM.
  9. So there is no boycott but every week we see the evidence of several thousand brave lions whose mantra is "not a penny more". Have I got it now?
  10. Oh, there's a fix all right but to identify it will require a clarity of vision which has proved way beyond the capabilities of the current "players". The fan board is a nice idea and I respect some participants but I'm not sure how readily it will be embraced. We'll see.
  11. Forget it. I came on solely to put right a false statement which I'd been told had been posted on this board. D'Art has confirmed the mendacity of the statement so it's job done. My remaining on this site would serve no purpose. Kindly delete my account.
  12. Repeatedly using the term "whatever" screams of indifference to me. And I don't know what you mean by saying 'there is no such thing as one Rangers fan's opinion'. I am one fan and I express my opinion.
  13. I don't have a Twitter account. Legal threats? Are you confusing me with someone else? While you're here, though, how are sales of your organisation's fake Rangers strips going? Mr Letham must be getting excited, he may own some priceless assets soon if your boycott holds.
  14. OK, getting back on topic: Forlan's last few posts on this thread make clear his complete indifference to Rangers fans' opinions. Given this, can I ask why he stood for election to a group representing the same fans whose opinions leave him wholly unmoved?
  15. So you calculate the "quota of arseholes" in the group in question to count no more than one? That's rather a negligible quota. Only problem with your theory is: that poster from RM doesn't use VB. He may have done once but then so did Gunslinger and Fury. Takes all sorts, eh? The point here being it's not just VB members who deplore your behaviour. Sorry to have to be the one to let you know but disgust at your actions is pretty widespread within the support. Cheers.
  16. Do you know the poster in question, Frankie? Moderator or not, unless he's an acquaintance of yours, are you wise to use insulting terms in a public forum to describe a Rangers fan? That doesn't seem conduct befitting a website owner to me. Something you might want to think about.
  17. You are aware, I take it, that calling a group of people "arseholes" could result in the perpetrator being arrested, should the victims choose to inform the police? Wouldn't that be ironic?
  18. Ah, so Paul's friend Dave is offering a 0% interest, condition-free cash gift to the club he loves, but is inexplicably being spurned? No wonder you're outraged. Spivs out. Let's call an EGM.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.