JTP

I'm sure I've read before that the RFFF cash can (or will) be used to bring Ibrox and MP back up to full health. We can also issue a rallying call for plumbers/painters/sparks/joiners to help the cause, guys in the trade would come out in force to repair Ibrox/MP for free. How you would implement that I don't know but it could be done.

Seems inevitable we need a DOF aswell. I just wonder if Magathe has already been earmarked for this .........

Who would you want Rab?

How would one go about buying those shares for example out of curiosity? Would they literally phone them up and say fancy selling or does something else come into play?

Let's hope RF keep up the friendly rivalry and swoop in to take some more of their shares .................

Brilliant Brilliant ............. just Brilliant. Keep going bears till this is over the line.

Fixed that Zappa.

450k shares = £157k 20k shares = £6k 50k shares = £16k (delayed publication request) That first one is a chunky number. Usually after these we seem to get RF or the RST coming out saying they have bought more. Lets hope for the same again.

I would also add that I think Vuckic has played a big part in us suddenly finding ourselves having chances (most notably Boyd missing them as a matter of fact) but it's refreshing to see a guy take the ball with his back to goal and being comfortable in doing so. That allows us to create on the back of that, even if not him doing the creating then guys like Law should know they can play off him and be comfortable that he will keep possession, create space or find a little angled pass to open up an attack. That in itself should be a massive massive help to our strikers. And let's face it ANY of our list of strikers need all the help they can get right now.

Haha far doo's mate. Now THAT would be brutal to watch.

I agree with that. But it doesn't take away the fact we still need to try and get promoted. The guys will remain so it's all we've got to work with.

Clark is static? We must watch a different player. So what's your front two then?

Which is why Clark and Boyd for me are our best partnership.

In terms of strikers Boyd is still by far and away our most dangerous. Daly will contribute more for example but I'd still take Boyd over him as he gets himself in goal scoring areas, Daly doesn't do that so well. Granted Boyd has been poor but our ability to create chances this season has possibly been the worst I've seen for a long time. It's like playing CM and going back to front, don't stand a chance of performing.

So the "tip" from the article is purely a guess ................

Well Kenny keep Jig and Simmonsen out of the starting 11 and you are giving us a better chance.

The problem I have is that it's near impossible to analyse a business plan that either doesn't exist or, at the very least, hasn't been made available for scrutiny. This guy has obviously seen MA's business plan then, wonder if he wouldn't mind sharing it with every single other Rangers fan who hasn't seen it yet .............

My biggest gripe with the VB is that they carry a ned like persona about them, infact I've seen actions with my own eyes that would confirm that. I won't tar them all with the same brush however as they also do good. However if they vote with the current Rats I see no way back for them to join the collective support. The split would be forever.

I'd spend my last pound funding the RFFF again if we used it all fighting these onerous contracts in every court in the country. Fraud. Fraud. Fraud.

Thanks Pete. It would have been easier if I ended my comments with "I know the law will state otherwise" :-)

Exactly. Which is why I'd love them to even say "yes we are available for £xxx. The board would then have to tell us why they don't want it. If anything it's another PR exercise in the good guys favour.

The Wigs want it in London. It removes the danger that there would be overcrowding. The fans have a good relationship so could we somehow manage to get Chelsea to offer their stadium at a reasonable cost? It would be interesting to see the Board's reply if it were. Anyway I've tweeted them (@JonStevo10) to ask the question. Feel free to RT to try and get at least a response.

I'm sure she got her fair share of designer shoes when they were married. They aren't now. By all means share out what he earned WHEN they were married, houses, cars etc. Whatever he earns after they divorced she should not be entitled to a penny. It should all go to his daughter. All IMO of course.

His daughter should get everything.

Thanks to Steve for all the updates on the start of the thread by the way.