simplythebest

Which to me is mainly based on the idea no-one can be trusted after the last two owners, rather than real genuine concerns. IMO anyway.

Any challenge towards the administrators has to go through the courts, I doubt not knowing enough about Charles Green would be considered valid.

Creditors are due the CVA proposal, not much else as far as i'm aware.

Frankly, they don't have to explain anything. Administration is meant to be a quiet private process generally, they've probably given more through the media than they should have. Rangers are special to all of us but we are realistically just another business in administration.

Shows nothing other than Whyte being over optimistic about administration, which I remember anyway. He said he wanted to exit admin by March payday.

Such big news it isn't even published on time. Mark Daly is a fraud.

The bids were knocked back because they weren't good enough, fairly simple.

I hope to never hear the name 'Blue Knights' again once all this is over.

Duff and Phelps will be Rangers legends if a CVA goes through, will have been worth every penny.

Bigging this up, christ. I can guarantee it will be nothing.

He'd have to communicate with them since he'd decided to go into administration. Big wow.

Not much of a problem there. If HMRC were willing to do a smaller and long term repayment plan for the Big Tax Case it probably wouldn't be so much of a worry. But it would seem they want their money now.

How good his start is will be decided by the CVA issue, all this stuff is just persnickety.

I don't see how to be honest, Whyte used money from Ticketus therefore putting us in debt to yet another company. Being in debt to the owners and investors is hardly going to cripple us.

I remember, but again, 'debt free' never means that literally no money is owed, Celtic have been called debt free for a while but of course they still owe money. Being in debt to the people that own you isn't really a concern.

Administration has happened, and liquidation will soon follow if Green doesn't see it through.

The trouble is when cynicism turns into hate and conclusions.

He was referring to not having unsustainable debt and millions owed to the taxman, it doesn't literally mean debt free as that wouldn't really be possible. The money being a loan is just a way of making the consortium money, again what else is to be expected from people with no connections to the club? A loan from the consortium isn't going to put us into administration again.

There is a middle ground to be had, maybe you have it. But some sound like they've made their mind up already.

He's not the only one in fairness. I appreciate the Whyte experience means we shouldn't treat anyone like a messiah until they've really proven themselves, but I don't see why it means we have to assume the absolute worst either.

That phrase is more pertinent if you're dealing with the same person. Green is not Whyte, and has never had any connection with Whyte whatever speculated.

Worth remembering as well staying would have suited players in terms of actually playing football as well, Wylde never managed to get clearance for Bolton.

Were players basically on youth contracts/wages really involved in the pay cuts?

Think I can agree with you for once casey. The cock sucking like praise for the wage cuts is something i've never got in to, yes it was a good gesture and I appreciate it but there's no way any of them will have had to adjust their lifestyles with the money they already had and are still earning.

To gunslinger anything that isn't a CVA is liquidation, Rangers dead etc. I don't feel that way myself.