Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    13,617
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. It is to placate the slabbering hordes who are waiting on title stripping. It is going to be fun to watch when they realise that's not happening & they've been misled.
  2. To be illegal they'd need to be tax evasion & HMRC have never called EBT's tax evasion. What will be interesting now is to see if BDO pursue anyone over this.
  3. I genuinely wonder if today's verdict was the one Liewell DIDN'T want. Had BDO/us(!) won then he could have passed it off as favouritism from the 'establishment' towards us. And there could have been no prospect therefore of title-stripping, trophies removed etc, Now though the slabbering, Rangers-hating hordes are restless and are demanding all sorts of actions which are totally undeliverable. What they overlook, as has been pointed out today more than once, is that HMRC never called these EBT schemes tax evasion, which is illegal. I suspect that was the thinking behind the SFA's carefully worded statement this afternoon. Now though will the hordes now turn on Liewell, Dumbaster and all the rest of our detractors ? Leading these people to believe removing of titles & trophies was a feasible outcome may come back to haunt them with a vengeance. maybe the tide has turned today, the day after our worst ever result for two reason: firstly we are rid off SDM and secondly are we about to witness an implosion as the hordes begin to realise they've been conned ?
  4. how can they try us twice for the same 'offence' ? and find us guilty twice of not declaring side letters. we got fined £250k IIRC
  5. The LNS enquiry was to determine whether there had been sporting advantage or not gained by using EBT's. It ruled not. Today was whether tax was due on EBT's. They are separate issues.
  6. Nothing to do with what we deserve or don't deserve. Was this guy eligible to play ?
  7. will BDO now pursue SDM ?
  8. what if BDO & HMRC come to an agreement & tax gets paid?
  9. Dalcio is here on loan from BenficaB who obviously deemed him surplus to requirements.
  10. They should be here & settled in already. If not they shouldn't be here. We needed serious rebuilding after last season in a short space of time. It didn't happen
  11. Ah well better luck next time eh Pedro ?
  12. Believe me there are no positives from tonight whatsoever.
  13. The Rangers board have screwed up big time with this appointment
  14. He's getting good at apologising isn't he?
  15. So who's going to sack him then ? The board ? King ? SR.? The D of F ? There's a bigger picture here that many of us don't want to see
  16. He'd be an improvement on Dalcio or Candeilas
  17. He's out of his depth first and foremost.
  18. His summer recruitment is in tatters. We needed 6 or 7 players to go straight into the starting XI who were better than what we had. That hasn't happened. The Rangers board have a big decision to take as to where we go from here
  19. Did we really need four defenders & two sitting MF players like we had tonight against this team given the fact we struggled to score goals last season?
  20. The buck stops with the manager
  21. He won't need to. He should be gone in the morning
  22. Who sacks Caixinha ? The D of F ?
  23. We go & get ourselves a new manager. Let the D of F get his choice
  24. There should have been no permanent managerial appointment til the D of F got appointed.
  25. Since Kingco took over they've made three managerial appointments. One caretaker & two permanent appointments. None have worked. That tells its own story. Caixinha cannot continue. First 5-1 at home by the yahoos and now this.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.