Rousseau

Fixed that for you.

On the other hand, I did captain Haaland in my fantasy team, so...

Haaland is broken. He needs some sort of handicap to make it fair, like goals counting half (that would still be 9 goals in 12 games).

Tillman was doing that and everyone just moaned.

Liverpool 0 - 1 Rangers FGS Colak

Liverpool v Rangers

People enjoy being a Rangers supporter? Oh - I'm much too nervous for that!

Thank you! Can't a man mope anymore? Let me mope.

You were the highest scorer this round with 4 pts.

It's also possible to praise the result, but be disappointed with the performance. We'll need to leave it there. You don't understand my position, I don't understand yours. Fair enough. "The hour of departure has arrived, and we go our ways, I to [mope over a poor performance], and you to [glory in a good result]. Which is better God only knows."

I can't see how anyone can sugar-coat and generalise performances based solely on the result and individual moments, irrespective of how we actally played during the game. (I jest.) I just don't enjoy watching us under GvB, and haven't done since last season, to be honest. Maybe I'm prejudiced in that regard.

Easy. When did I say there were "no positives"? I thought the second goal was exquisite, which I posted more than once. I still don't think the overall performance was any better than every other domestic game.

Everyone just going to ignore my awesome meme? I'm hurt...

Better than what? Better in what way? I've found every domestic game - especially this season - poor under GvB. It's most definitely the best domestic away result. However, the performance is just more of the same, though, which is not good enough, going forward. We're not winning 8, 9, 10 games on the bounce playing like this, never mind winning the league. Everything seems to be rosy because we won, but, for me, nothing has changed in terms of our performance.

We'll need to agree to disagree. I don't think we played well.

50% is outstanding. The average is 10%.

Yes, and missed two (?) sitters. But that's 5 attempts. Five attempts in 45 minutes is not good enough. No team scores every chance. We've been clinical today, which is great to see, but the performance was not good.

I'll take that result every time at Tynecastle. I still maintain that it was not a good performance. It's the same old that we've shown all season. Result and performance are two different things. We were just clinical.

I feel similar to the game against Ross County at Ibrox: 85 minutes of p*sh, then 3 goals at the end makes it 4-0. 4-0 sounds fantastic, but it was poor for 85 minutes. We can't rely on scoring a couple of late goals because the opponent has finally chucked it.

More of that second goal, please! It was exquisite!

I don't think we played well. We were clinical in the first half, then they went down to 10-men. A few suggested the second half was poor, which it was, but, IMO, it was like the first half. The only difference being that Hearts were coming at us and giving us a counter opportunity, which dried up in the second. I think it's silly to sugarcoat it. Getting results like that - as great as it is - is not sustainable if we're not playing well.

No Correct Scores today, but plenty of points from Colak as FGS. Surprisingly, we have four not getting the Correct Result! Correct Result (1 pt): Rousseau, BEAR, Yorkie, Bill, GS, One, compo, Dado, Stew, Devil, Mal, DJ, Graeme, WB91, Ted, Ian, buster, CammyF, FS, 26th and MacK. Correct Number of Rangers Goals (1pt): Graeme. FGS (2 pts): Rousseau, BEAR, Yorkie, Bill, GS, compo, Mal, DJ, Graeme, Franc, Ian, Buster, 26th and r_s Correct Score (3 pts): - Latest Standings:

I'll take that result every time. However, I don't think we've played well, at all. I think it's silly to let the emphatic result overshadow that, which is something we do quite often as fans. (The reverse is true too: we get down in the doldrums after dropped points even if we pepper the opponents' goal.)