scotjo

Simply by what I already stated, he scored a good amount last season and has taken up where he left off, I don't see it as a panic buy and let's face it he's about the only attainable striker in form at the moment.

See this is where I kind of disagree, Waghorn and Garner may individually be as good or 'better' than Moult but it's the old chestnut, some players in a system maybe better suited than others even if not better players, Moult at least knows the teams up here and has had reasonable success, whereas Waghorn ( apart from the championship) and Garner haven't.

Not really sure about Hardie, still don't think he's going to do it.

Could be, but often and I also include last season in this, they did nothing even with service, in this sense Naismith would improve the whole complexion of the forward line.

Oh That IS a shame!

I am disappointed that Pedro is not going for another striker given our ineffectiveness up front, given Moult wouldn't cost much we should go for him. I know people say he can do it at Motherwell but maybe not at Rangers, but he knows where the goals are and it would be daft not to go for him. Put it this way we need someone who at least can link the midfield with the strikers and if we don't go for a striker we should defo get Naismith and Miller can go onto the bench.

The abuse scandal was stratospheric but will it hurt the current club as it is? Can you imagine had it been us what the press would have been like? Unless they get long term injuries to 5 players I can think of.

I don't buy it, I just noticed it online but I didn't click.

Good draw but I actually fancied having a go at ST Brendans as it's early in the season when we get them and they won't have been tested, I think we would be a wee shock to their system.

Noticed online their headline from Mark Allen interview is Rangers to be selling club. What is it with this mob? I would say what he meant was when the time and circumstances are right we will sell, in that sense their beloved team are also a 'selling' club and everyone else in Scotland, but not to us. Not that this headline surprises me but where do you even start with this rag? Not when they concocted a negative headline on the day of the new retail deal when they were not even in attendance, just like this occasion and same negative angle. Anything they think is negative for us they will spin to put that slant on it, but it's not the negative they hope it is.

Can't get this episode to play.

Don't think there is any split.

Sensed the disappointment in the reporter when he stated he would have come anyway regardless of being in Europe.

Our existence isn't at stake, we'll survive ( no stripping can take place anyway) but I am not sure THEY will.

Isn't it true that the SPFL have no power to impose such a sanction? they made this statement in 2015.

Think Jack will be that player and Dorrans will be up for the fight as well as being a right good player.

I would suggest it's the Yahoo!'s who are trying to cheat, looking at a way to steal our titles, which can't happen.

It's perverting the course of justice.

After the appeal that was heard before the one at the Supreme Court, the one in 2015 the SPFL stated that no such mechanism for title stripping existed. All sensationalist rubbish from the press who surely would have known this even if it was at this point yet still peddled out the same strip the titles guff and also why did Celtic issue their moaning statement when surely they must also have been aware of this. It's the same as someone wanting a murderer to be executed in Britain, no such sanction exists. .

Retarded sheep wouldn't benefit trophy wise anyway unless prize money.

Don't see anything changing the decision.

Or rather it IS going to end well. Lol.

That's right enough, Thanks I was getting carried away, reckon we're in the clear.

There is limited scope for any sanctions, as the SPFL said they would look into it, as opposed to the SFA who issued a statement that no action can be taken from them my only concern is that the 'limited sanction' could mean the SPFL may dock us points for next season? that would screw us or can it only be the oldco that can be fined and the newco can't be affected? Surely they couldn't do this.

Don't think it did us too much harm at that time, I don't think we over relied on these players, we had very good players like Robertson, McCall, Steven etc to supplement them, certainly worked fine in the league.