Jump to content

 

 

Two match ban for miller


Recommended Posts

What other multi-million pound industry would totally shut down its governing structure, when the very industry that it is supposed to be regulating and administering the laws of the game to is involved in the continuing business that these amateurs are charged with responsibility for. Scottish football needs one body to run it 365 days of the year, not free loaders and amateurs, who are only in it for themselves.

Questions must be asked about the Loovens appeal situation, which was spun out for almost six months, he was not prevented from playing in any games during this period, Rangers must stand up for the player, the supporters and even handedness. by insisting on a full public account of the Miller and Loovens situations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is surprising is that Collum stated that there was violent intent from both a punch and a kick as well , talk about covering all the bases

 

Now.... I could actually be convinced to say there was intent from a kick. But from a punch ? No chance.

 

Will be all the sweeter when we beat the Tims on Sunday without one half of the dynamic duo :thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What other multi-million pound industry would totally shut down its governing structure, when the very industry that it is supposed to be regulating and administering the laws of the game to is involved in the continuing business that these amateurs are charged with responsibility for. Scottish football needs one body to run it 365 days of the year, not free loaders and amateurs, who are only in it for themselves.

Questions must be asked about the Loovens appeal situation, which was spun out for almost six months, he was not prevented from playing in any games during this period, Rangers must stand up for the player, the supporters and even handedness. by insisting on a full public account of the Miller and Loovens situations.

 

Different scenarios unfortunately. In one the ref said he was wrong, in the other the ref stands by his decision. There should be questions over why the Loovens situation lasted so long, but they are quite clear as to why Miller can't be treated the same as him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Different scenarios unfortunately. In one the ref said he was wrong, in the other the ref stands by his decision. There should be questions over why the Loovens situation lasted so long, but they are quite clear as to why Miller can't be treated the same as him.

 

I posted this already, the Loovens one is totally different scenario as the ref never seen the incident and therefore it went to a video review panel which is made up of third party people and not anyone from the SFA,still took far too long to be dealt with all the same,but different cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.