Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

I think we'd probably need a better than mediocre run in the Europa league plus a couple of domestic cup runs to break even without CL money - and that's without spending on players.

 

Basically we should have been budgeting that way for the last 10 years and used any CL cash as spending money on players spread over a couple of seasons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

.

Possibly with the prize money due to us, but I'm not certain if it would be possible to estimate the sum due to us from the �£340m TV market pool until UEFA have worked this out, which I'm led to believe doesn't happen until the tournament finishes. This makes sense when you consider that our percentage of TV market share for the Champions League can still change while the tournament is running as subscription numbers can quickly change going into the later stages and result in our share rising or falling.

 

The club would still need to include an estimate of the income from the CL. It is a material amount and they would be duty bound to make an estimate of it and book it as income and a receivable.

 

It will be included even though it isnt physically collected till the end of the season.

 

Audited financials usually have terminology in the footnotes which state that for certain items estimates are used and those estimates could ultimately settle for a different amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this mean that by continuing to work as we currently are we would be close to breaking even (or better?) in a future season with no CL group stage money? I only ask because while we're looking good for CL group stage entry for next season, the following season's CL group stage entry is far from certain, so you'd like to think that we'd be working towards being able to operate without making a loss in a scenario where we don't make it to the group stage.

 

That's got to be the Holy Grail for Rangers, breakeven without CL income. Which means there is probably some downsizing still to go unless we can improve things on the 'other income' side, particularly merchandising which has fallen well short of what could be achieved (IMO). Or else start producing and selling young talent.

 

I think this is one of those times when, however reluctantly for some, you have to give Jack his jacket for a job well done. One Donald Muir, there's only one Donald Muir...... just joking!:devil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't that be including in the June accounts? I realise you've said it's deferred. Is there a reason why that happened and does it happen every year?

 

Do you expect Bluedells valuation to be truer in June 2010's accounts?

 

Happens every year. June is always the best position for the debt - season ticket money for the next season has been banked.

 

I expect net debt to be �£25m+ at June 2010.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.