Super_Ally 0 Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 I cant remember exactly when in the match, believe it may have been second half, but Crocker made a comment about Celtic beating us to Loovens signature. Iirc did we not sign Boogie instead. So regardless of whether or not they beat us to Loovens signing I think we can all see who the real winners are there. Possibly the best player in Scotland for the past few years or that poncey-haired muppet Celtic have. Even Ridiculous slagged him after the game. Do we honestly believe Walter wanted a defender who is that bad anyway? Or would Smith have made him a player. Either way, thank fuck we never got him and have Madjid instead. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totti 0 Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 We have come off much, much better than them in players both clubs have targeted. Walter certainly did want him though, we tried very hard for a long time to sign him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted October 24, 2010 Author Share Posted October 24, 2010 We have come off much, much better than them in players both clubs have targeted. Walter certainly did want him though, we tried very hard for a long time to sign him. Which begs the question; was Walters judgement on a centre back out for the first time since he returned and Loovens is just shit, or could Walter have made him a player? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totti 0 Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 I think a bit of both. Loovens is no Bougherra and wouldn't have been a terrific signing but at the same time being in an organised system with an astute manager makes a centre back a lot better. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
metlika 0 Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Walter might have made him a player but thankfully the shit picked the wrong club and is failing quite badly error after error and assaulting our players as well means can't stand the guy. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 And tell Crocker it is Low vens and not Loo vens! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza_8 233 Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Dirk Kuyt is another who causes some concern amongst commentators. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Dirk Kuyt is another who causes some concern amongst commentators. It is pronounced as K out. Just for your info Kuit sounds the same and is your calf muscle. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexscottislegend 2,090 Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 It is pronounced as K out. Just for your info Kuit sounds the same and is your calf muscle. So can you explain why it is Johann CRYFF and not CROWF? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 So can you explain why it is Johann CRYFF and not CROWF? It is Johan Cruijff and the uij also make a ou sound so it is Johan Crouff 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.