alanmidd 0 Posted September 20, 2006 Author Share Posted September 20, 2006 The report suggested that big sam knew his son was getting pais for deals that he wasn't registered as being involved in. This is an offence under new FA rules so I expect there will be repercausions for Sam and Bolton 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colshy18 0 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 always knew bolton were bent! that really should be the end of sam allardyce! how much more evidence do they need? the chelsea thing is a load of crap! that happens every day in football. they must`ve been given a `bung` by wenger to steer clear of arsenal gav;) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 1,876 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 There's no way Arsenal could afford a bung - they're £262.1m in debt! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whosthedado 1,500 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 I thought the program was a little disappointing. Allardyce and Bolton ended up being the only ones to be looked at really. The program implied that other managers were involved too, but they never had any evidence. I think Sam's in hot water now though 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
m_momo1 0 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 There could be a part two I also found it disappointing even though I caught the last 15-20min was hoping to see dodgey managers and agents in closed off car parks wearing trench coats dropping of the loot in a bin 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
m_momo1 0 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 There could be a part two I also found it disappointing even though I caught the last 15-20min was hoping to see dodgey managers and agents in closed off car parks wearing trench coats dropping of the loot in a bin 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colshy18 0 Posted September 21, 2006 Share Posted September 21, 2006 will the part 2 be a repeat of the first part like your first and second posts? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted September 21, 2006 Share Posted September 21, 2006 always knew bolton were bent! that really should be the end of sam allardyce! how much more evidence do they need? the chelsea thing is a load of crap! that happens every day in football. They have to prove big Sam knew and not just a load of twaddle from an agent and Sams son. They have Frank Arnessen actually making an offer so i don't know that Chelsea are in a better position than Bolton. Yes it happens everyday that is why they are investigating it. There are Banks robbed nearly everyday but that does not make it legal or acceptable 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 I watched it and although it was interesting there was very little hard evidence. There was no-one caught on camera accepting a bung. The stuff on Harry Redknapp is laughable as all he has spoken of is that he likes a certain player - hardly an offence and the kind of conversation that probably goes on at every football club every day. The interesting stuff will relate to Frank Arnesen and Big Sam. Surely his son resigning as an agent indicates theres more to this than meets the eye. I didn't watch it as I think the Panorama team are a bunch of terrible journalists who make things up and twist things without having any real evidence. Sounds like they did it again. I refuse to watch the programme since the OF, "Scotland's shame" one which was incredibly poorly reported. We do have a problem but it shouldn't be twisted and exagerated for sensationalism. They made out the word "Tim" was sectarian so it's no wonder they're making out that if you say you like a player it means you're up to something dodgy... They just have no credibility at all and I'll take anything they say with a huge pinch of salt. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The_Rock Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 I didn't watch it as I think the Panorama team are a bunch of terrible journalists who make things up and twist things without having any real evidence. Sounds like they did it again. I refuse to watch the programme since the OF, "Scotland's shame" one which was incredibly poorly reported. We do have a problem but it shouldn't be twisted and exagerated for sensationalism. They made out the word "Tim" was sectarian so it's no wonder they're making out that if you say you like a player it means you're up to something dodgy... They just have no credibility at all and I'll take anything they say with a huge pinch of salt. Agreed mate , there job is to get viewers not report the truth , no hard evidence , sheer shite . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.