Jump to content

 

 

Gersnet to cease?


Recommended Posts

"Don't worry about a thing - 'Cause every little thing gonna be alright."

 

Heidegger had it sussed.

 

Philosophy, and society as a whole, is preoccupied with what it is that exists. His belief was that we find ourselves "always already" fallen into a world that already existed. But he insisted that we had forgotten the basic question of what it is to exist, of what being itself is. This question defines our central nature. He argued that we are practical agents, caring and concerned about our projects in the world, and allowing it to reveal, or "unconceal" itself to us. He came to believe that our proactive interference and manipulation of reality is often harmful and hides our true being as essentially limited participants, not masters, of the world which we discover.

 

By this, I assume that we may morph into a porn site - albeit with fundamental Protestant values ( I'll get my head around that yet) or a dating site (which would certainaly marginalise Frankie) or a forum discussing existentialism.

Or maybe we'll still be here moaning about why we missed out on the 60th league title.

My money's on the the latter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I've expressed my desire to move to a parallel universe, we may still exsist there, hmmmm..... lol

 

Interesting Dutchy. Superstring and hyperspace theory lends credibility to the fact that - out there - there is a parallel universe where the Rangers are acclaimed as being the best ever team in existence, with world beating superstars such as player of the year Kirk Broadfoot, Messi, Iniesta and Jeffers. Our income from Sky Sports is staggering. Of course, Celtic don't see any of this, as they play in West Region Central Division Two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Don't worry about a thing - 'Cause every little thing gonna be alright."

 

Heidegger had it sussed.

 

Philosophy, and society as a whole, is preoccupied with what it is that exists. His belief was that we find ourselves "always already" fallen into a world that already existed. But he insisted that we had forgotten the basic question of what it is to exist, of what being itself is. This question defines our central nature. He argued that we are practical agents, caring and concerned about our projects in the world, and allowing it to reveal, or "unconceal" itself to us. He came to believe that our proactive interference and manipulation of reality is often harmful and hides our true being as essentially limited participants, not masters, of the world which we discover.

 

I was thinking the exact same but came to the alternative conclusion that, it's beyond my control. So battered another Tunnocks Teacake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.