Ergatrude 0 Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 So what does this information gain? Do any of these people have any Celtic connections or previous issues regarding Rangers? Or was it in fact an impartial independent panel? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nacho's his name Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 As impartial as it gets at the SFA nowadays. Anonymity and transparency seem to the buzz words in that organisation now. I can't see Campell Ogilvie lasting much longer So what does this information gain? Do any of these people have any Celtic connections or previous issues regarding Rangers? Or was it in fact an impartial independent panel? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 So what does this information gain? Do any of these people have any Celtic connections or previous issues regarding Rangers? Or was it in fact an impartial independent panel? No panel is independent, apparently. It's all one almighty plan to kill Rangers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 As impartial as it gets at the SFA nowadays.Anonymity and transparency seem to the buzz words in that organisation now. I can't see Campell Ogilvie lasting much longer How many of the three are not impartial, and what have they done previously to gain that tag? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 Have they been passed as fit and proper?? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nacho's his name Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 Impartial in recent history or anytime before that? I know nothing about them other than trying to kill our club How many of the three are not impartial, and what have they done previously to gain that tag? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 "Anonymity and transparency" What an oxymoron that is. "We need to be transparent" - copyright Stewart Regan "Our Panel are anonymous" (therefore we are not transparent) - copyright Stewart Regan You couldnt make this clown up if you tried. Stewart Regan.... BUFFOON, FOOL, INCOMPETENT BASTARD. Get out of our game NOW whilst we still have a game in Scotland to care about. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,348 Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 I genuinely don't believe that anyone who is impartial and has a detailed understanding of the situation could have come to the conclusion that these punishments were appropriate. The demand for anonymity and the Regan connection also backs up that. Regan has shown with other appointments such as Lunny that he will people that have a bias. The only conclusion that any rational person can reach is that these three are in no way impartial. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 First story on the radio news this morning SFA call in police after the transparent and impartial but can't be named panel, receive threatening communications. Now they never said it was Rangers fans but dropped a big hint by linking Ally's call for the three to be named at the end of the story. Funny how they never call in the police when one of their own Refs gets the usual death threats from the GFITW time after time. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juancornetto 1 Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 (edited) First story on the radio news this morning SFA call in police after the transparent and impartial but can't be named panel, receive threatening communications. Now they never said it was Rangers fans but dropped a big hint by linking Ally's call for the three to be named at the end of the story. Funny how they never call in the police when one of their own Refs gets the usual death threats from the GFITW time after time. This is the final straw for me, I don't buy into media conspiracies normally but it's abundantly clear that the SFA have been upset by the fans reaction to the sanctions (boycotting, contacting sponsors etc) and have decided to make it look like they are under threat. Straight out of the Peter Lawell handbook on how to influence opinion and gain an advantage for yourself. Edited April 26, 2012 by Juancornetto 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.