Frankie 8,186 Posted May 6, 2014 Author Share Posted May 6, 2014 OK perhaps I could have expressed it better but I still think that Mr King's intention is to try to takeover the club as cheaply as possible and the lack of anything concrete from him aside from the current scheme speaks volumes. That may well be his intention but, as per the other thread, I think it's unfair to suggest fans that don't renew are being used by him when most just lack faith in the board. Ergo, when are intelligent people like yourself, going to avoid the pointless digs at others and ask why the club continue to fail us. We don't need to be fans of King, Murray or Houston to ask that more important question. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 kings goal isn't to take over the club for as little as possible. it's to do it without a penny going to the ****s. 50 million is a hell of a lot of cash, not all of it kings of course. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 That may well be his intention but, as per the other thread, I think it's unfair to suggest fans that don't renew are being used by him when most just lack faith in the board. Ergo, when are intelligent people like yourself, going to avoid the pointless digs at others and ask why the club continue to fail us. We don't need to be fans of King, Murray or Houston to ask that more important question. Thank you for the compliment. I agree that whether fans are for King or against the Board isn't the real issue here. The real issue is how the Club is going to move forward. I see no point (unless as I have said previously you are going to pay for a forensic accounting operation and then follow through with civil actions if you can find evidence of wrongdoing by past or current directors) in raking over the coals of the myriad past mistakes, what's done is done and we are where we are; and that is not a good place. If 10's of thousands do not renew over the summer we face the very real prospect of admin2 and starting the new season on a large penalty points deduction. The Club can do nothing without the income from its fans; that's why occasionally I get so upset with those who would delay or withhold their money in the mistaken belief that they will somehow oust the Board that they clearly detest when that will not be the outcome at all. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Thank you for the compliment. I agree that whether fans are for King or against the Board isn't the real issue here. The real issue is how the Club is going to move forward. I see no point (unless as I have said previously you are going to pay for a forensic accounting operation and then follow through with civil actions if you can find evidence of wrongdoing by past or current directors) in raking over the coals of the myriad past mistakes, what's done is done and we are where we are; and that is not a good place. If 10's of thousands do not renew over the summer we face the very real prospect of admin2 and starting the new season on a large penalty points deduction. The Club can do nothing without the income from its fans; that's why occasionally I get so upset with those who would delay or withhold their money in the mistaken belief that they will somehow oust the Board that they clearly detest when that will not be the outcome at all. that's where dave kings scheme is so important it's a ready source of cash for the board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,186 Posted May 6, 2014 Author Share Posted May 6, 2014 Thank you for the compliment. I agree that whether fans are for King or against the Board isn't the real issue here. The real issue is how the Club is going to move forward. I see no point (unless as I have said previously you are going to pay for a forensic accounting operation and then follow through with civil actions if you can find evidence of wrongdoing by past or current directors) in raking over the coals of the myriad past mistakes, what's done is done and we are where we are; and that is not a good place. If 10's of thousands do not renew over the summer we face the very real prospect of admin2 and starting the new season on a large penalty points deduction. The Club can do nothing without the income from its fans; that's why occasionally I get so upset with those who would delay or withhold their money in the mistaken belief that they will somehow oust the Board that they clearly detest when that will not be the outcome at all. The amount of money which goes into the club is entirely the responsibility of the club. As such, I'd suggest focussing on why they're struggling to address this rather than attacking those who are concerned about it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 that's where dave kings scheme is so important it's a ready source of cash for the board. I'd agree with that statement with the substitution of one word that's where dave kings scheme is so important it's a ready source of cash for the club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 The amount of money which goes into the club is entirely the responsibility of the club. As such, I'd suggest focussing on why they're struggling to address this rather than attacking those who are concerned about it. I have a feeling that the club wanted to see what King's scheme looked like first; I'd be shocked and disappointed if they don't mount an aggressive counter offensive and marketing campaign over the summer. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 I have a feeling that the club wanted to see what King's scheme looked like first; I'd be shocked and disappointed if they don't mount an aggressive counter offensive and marketing campaign over the summer. They'd better be quick although the amount of time spent on a hollow business review that just happened to come out doesn't bode well. In fact, perhaps it was actually a marketing campaign. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,186 Posted May 6, 2014 Author Share Posted May 6, 2014 I have a feeling that the club wanted to see what King's scheme looked like first; I'd be shocked and disappointed if they don't mount an aggressive counter offensive and marketing campaign over the summer. These campaigns will only be successful via investment. Where is it coming from? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 My apologies it appears the total number of penny shares issued was 19,225,200 not the 18,825,000 that I previously stated. Might just be my understanding of the info.... The 2nd column represents the price per share??? 3,365,000 shares @ £1 doesn't equate to £33,650.00 The total values in column 4 represents 33,415,200 shares @ £0.01...... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.