Bluedell 5,329 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 them or nowhere if they are intent on running us like present And you fully understand the implications of nowhere? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 at some point you will get an honest admin if you stick to your demands for proper governance. it took portesmouth about 5 tries An honest administrator won't change the shareholders. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 So it shouldn't be a consideration for fans as well? Let's not worry if we go into administration and have to get rid of all our players again? Of course, but it should also be of prime concern to the administrators. They are the ones who should be demanding that plans for the future are robust, realistic, and most of all, achievable. If there is a serious campaign against one of the bidders, the latter part must be seen as a major concern. Sadly, all of that is based on legitimate administrators being hired. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Is administration now what the boycotters are trying to achieve? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted September 11, 2014 Author Share Posted September 11, 2014 An honest administrator won't change the shareholders. What would/could honest administrators do to help? I'm thinking immediately of onerous contracts but can they look at getting supporters more involved which might put off investors not interested in the well being of the club? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AuldBear Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 They should take big steps right out of our club. It will be a disgrace if they end up in administration after the support ( financial and vocal ) that they have recieved from the Rangers fans. Enough is enough, now is the time for the people to take control of Rangers and appoint their own chairman. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted September 11, 2014 Author Share Posted September 11, 2014 Is administration now what the boycotters are trying to achieve? Bears in my work who don't come near forums or social media are looking at it as a way out. These guys get their news from the red tops. I was surprised to hear them say that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 What would/could honest administrators do to help? I'm thinking immediately of onerous contracts but can they look at getting supporters more involved which might put off investors not interested in the well being of the club? I'm not enough of an expert to comment as to what the possibilities are, but it's not necessarily the answers that everyone hopes for. I presume that the current shareholders could set up a pre-pack and effectively control doesn't change. The honesty of the admin doesn't preclude control remaining where it is, I believe. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,149 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 There are absolutely no certainties with respect to an insolvency event - other than the fact we'd lose 25 points. Onerous contracts, shareholding levels and ownership may not change and the quality of administrator perhaps not something to rely on either. Forcing the club towards this is a huge gamble without a credible alternative. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 I'm not enough of an expert to comment as to what the possibilities are, but it's not necessarily the answers that everyone hopes for. I presume that the current shareholders could set up a pre-pack and effectively control doesn't change. The honesty of the admin doesn't preclude control remaining where it is, I believe. Which is why any boycott would only be lifted post an admin where the governance changes. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.