Rangersitis 0 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 Naughty if it is though. "I'll bail you lot out by handing some of the cash from sold Rangers jerseys over." Nobody said it was fair. The current situation took years of planning and implementation. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 Nobody said it was fair. The current situation took years of planning and implementation. And yet the final nail's still to be hammered in. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 And yet the final nail's still to be hammered in. Probably more than one still to go. This thing has a bit to run yet, I believe. It's sickening. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 Was this loan not a loan and in fact the £2.7m Rangers Retail owes Rangers? SB or anyone, is that 2.7M a current number ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 SB or anyone, is that 2.7M a current number ? From memory that's what we are (were) owed from merchandise sales. Need to see the updated accounts for proof 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 From memory that's what we are (were) owed from merchandise sales. Need to see the updated accounts for proof If there was a significant figure still (owed) then that would be one hell of a liberty he was taking. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 SB or anyone, is that 2.7M a current number ? Forlanssister is the man to ask. The figure quoted was around that mark. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 Forlanssister is the man to ask. The figure quoted was around that mark. At 31 December 2013 it was..... Included within cash balances is £1,669,000 relating to Rangers Retail Limited, which is not immediately available as working capital to the Group as a whole. It was £946,000 at 30 June 2013, so pretty safe to say it's well over £2m now. In all probability he is in fact loaning us our own money, will probably get 100% of Rangers Retail Ltd as part of the deal too no doubt. We've been well and truly f*&ked up the arse sans lube again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 At 31 December 2013 it was..... It was £946,000 at 30 June 2013, so pretty safe to say it's well over £2m now. In all probability he is in fact loaning us our own money, will probably get 100% of Rangers Retail Ltd as part of the deal too no doubt. We've been well and truly f*&ked up the arse sans lube again. Eventually found it half way down. http://rangers.g3dhosting.com/regulatory_news_article/375 Forlan, I suppose we can't rule out the possibility that this money, in part or wholly has been made available to RIFC at some point in 2014 ?? The two directors on the Rangers Retail board representing RIFC just happen to be Wallace and Nash. Would it be allowed to have future Ashely directors from the RIFC board take the places of GW & PN on Rangers Retail? It says in the SH01 that to pay dividends you need a unanomous vote from directors to pay A and B shares. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 Eventually found it half way down. http://rangers.g3dhosting.com/regulatory_news_article/375 Forlan, I suppose we can't rule out the possibility that this money, in part or wholly has been made available to RIFC at some point in 2014 ?? The two directors on the Rangers Retail board representing RIFC just happen to be Wallace and Nash. Would it be allowed to have future Ashely directors from the RIFC board take the places of GW & PN on Rangers Retail? It says in the SH01 that to pay dividends you need a unanomous vote from directors to pay A and B shares. Can't see there being another "Rangers" director there as Ashley will activate the buyout clause. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.