Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Can't see there being another "Rangers" director there as Ashley will activate the buyout clause.

 

Got you and that is only a percentage of one years profits or turnover IIRC.

 

Following the money on a quick fag packet, would I be right in saying that Ashely is going to end up one, if not the biggest profiteer out of our whole mess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank's FS !

 

So it becomes a wee bitty clearer (to me at least) why Ashely would want the IP rights on badge/trademark.

 

If I follow, it would mean that royalty payments due to RIFC would be reduced or not necessary, dependent on what exactly Ashely could get his hands on.

 

Thinking about it, the money withheld in the accounts. Could that possibly correspond in part with payments due to third parties who currently own part of our IP rights ?

 

 

ps. just noted the last paragraph (I'm half asleep) which I don't know if standard for this type of JV. Could have significance it there is indeed 3rd party ownership as rumoured elsewhere.

Edited by buster.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HurlockGrunt

So just to be clear - the joint venture (Rangers Retail) owns all the rights to our gear? RFCL is 100% owned by RIFC and is a 51% shareholder in the joint venture with SDI holding the other 49%? On execution of the trigger the 51% becomes owned by SDI for a fixed sum commensurate with 50% of last year's profits?

 

Zero return to us?

 

For how long?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So just to be clear - the joint venture (Rangers Retail) owns all the rights to our gear? RFCL is 100% owned by RIFC and is a 51% shareholder in the joint venture with SDI holding the other 49%? On execution of the trigger the 51% becomes owned by SDI for a fixed sum commensurate with 50% of last year's profits?

 

Zero return to us?

 

For how long?

 

In perpetuity probably.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So just to be clear - the joint venture (Rangers Retail) owns all the rights to our gear? RFCL is 100% owned by RIFC and is a 51% shareholder in the joint venture with SDI holding the other 49%? On execution of the trigger the 51% becomes owned by SDI for a fixed sum commensurate with 50% of last year's profits?

 

Zero return to us?

 

For how long?

 

SD have 49% in 'A' class shares which count double in any votes regarding financial matters.

RIFC have 51%, in 'B' class shares

 

Effectively SD control the joint venture.

 

Read the document in post 32 for details of the latter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any idea what the deadlock provisions are?

 

I'ii take a stab at an example :whistle: (subject to correction / Forlan is the expert)

 

An example may be that unanamous agreement between directors for paying dividends for a class of share cannot be reached and this creates a 'deadlock matter'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.