Jump to content

 

 

Tav v Hodson


Recommended Posts

I think Tav is still the better RB, Hodson is a steady player who also likes to get forward, however I think both of them playing gives us a strength/balance to the team so I am quite happy they both are playing.

 

Thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Tav is still the better RB, Hodson is a steady player who also likes to get forward, however I think both of them playing gives us a strength/balance to the team so I am quite happy they both are playing.

 

Thoughts?

Agreed the team looks far more balanced with both playing. Tav missed three good chances tonight that he on another day might score. Tonight's team is the strongest we have imo. I will have no problem if this team plays against the tims.

.

Edited by pete
Link to post
Share on other sites

In games like yesterday's this system works. Tav was complementing the defensive midfield work of Halliday and added some welcomed steel. Likewise, he had the freedom to go forward. Could well be that we are trialling this for the Scum game. We sure looked more safe at the back with Hodson, who IMHO is backing up the centre halfs better.

Edited by der Berliner
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hodson is more defensively sound, but I also think he's more of a team player -- his instinctive one-twos with Waghorn, Holt were terrific to watch. However, Tavernier is a very good player for us; it'll maybe just take a little time to figure out his exact role.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Hodson is a better RB.

 

I mentioned in the match thread that we finally have some strength in depth now, and the manager has some real selection headaches. For example, if Hodson is at RB, I'd still like to hav Tav in the team - but then where does Windass go?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Hodson is a better RB.

 

I mentioned in the match thread that we finally have some strength in depth now, and the manager has some real selection headaches. For example, if Hodson is at RB, I'd still like to hav Tav in the team - but then where does Windass go?

 

It is probably a thing for where we play and whom we play. Tav adds steel and pace to midfield, plus is willing to shoot. Windass is more left-sided, adds less steel, but more technique ... and also likes to shoot. I don't mind if Windass gets fully fit first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.