Rangers players didn’t get poor Paul Le Guen the boot with an underhand revolt…

[limeburner 0]

I think him walking with no pay off was a very decent thing and i respect him for that.

He was a poor manager but no money grabber.Credit where its due.

[aweebluesoandso 290]

The cakes done done it, Et tu Greggs lol

[pete 2,499]

Oh yes this is why Boyd has been super-fit for every other manager and why Smith also ditched Ferguson.

[calscot 0]

Yeah, they got Walter sacked too - oh wait...

 

Every player has his flaws, it's up to a good manager to deal with it and get a winning team on the pitch.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Oh yes this is why Boyd has been super-fit for every other manager and why Smith also ditched Ferguson.

And why le guen is managing real

 

 

[pete 2,499]

Yeah, they got Walter sacked too - oh wait...

 

Every player has his flaws, it's up to a good manager to deal with it and get a winning team on the pitch.

 

Walter got rid of Ferguson.

[calscot 0]

Walter got rid of Ferguson.

 

You're just making my point. The player became an apparent problem to Walter and he "managed" it - without negatively affecting the success of the club or his job security. Warburton did the same with Barton (although he hasn't given the relative success).

 

IIRC correctly Murray offered to get rid of Ferguson, but didn't want to do that without commitment and confidence from Le Guen, but that wasn't forthcoming and the Frenchman made an ignominious exit.

[calscot 0]

I think it can be easily argued that BF and KB had more success than PLG in the following years after the latter walked.

[ian1964 10,457]

PLG was a disaster of an appointment!, he still is a disaster of a manager!, that is the truth.

[colinstein 294]

PLG was a disaster of an appointment!, he still is a disaster of a manager!, that is the truth.

 

what's his record in the last 10 years...........anyone be arsed looking it up