aweebluesoandso 290 Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Unlucky for the young ones, I thought we played the better football, they were stronger but looked to kick the shite out of Gilmour. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Unfortunately Celtic were more comfortable on the ball and looked better for most of the game. I don't know the age difference but most of our players looked far younger. The coloured boy that came on as sub looked quite good. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Unlucky for the young ones, I thought we played the better football, they were stronger but looked to kick the shite out of Gilmour. Were you watching the same game or were you watching the Champions league? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Were you watching the same game or were you watching the Champions league? Watching it with my blue coloured spectacles on of course. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacK1950 2,231 Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Watched it on STV Glasgow thought it was a very poor game and worry about youngsters stepping an age group as none shone except Gilmour maybe but only just. Worst commentary I have ever heard even Alba is better and that's not in English. Hate to say it but better team won. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elfideldo 406 Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 My report on tonight's game and last night's 13's game against a Dublin Schoolboys U14's Select https://rfcyouths.wordpress.com/2017/04/20/glasgow-cup-final/ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elfideldo 406 Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 (edited) Unfortunately Celtic were more comfortable on the ball and looked better for most of the game. I don't know the age difference but most of our players looked far younger. The coloured boy that came on as sub looked quite good. Celtic's starting 11 were all 2000's and pretty much their full strength team. Just noticed their keeper is a 2001. Rangers started with four 2001's, who can play next year (well three of them will be there), we were without to likely starters in Jack Thomson and Rhys Breen. Edited April 20, 2017 by elfideldo 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 These games are far too often judged on results only, as elfideldo posted above even at this age group age is a massive factor, I thought it was a decent game and they tried to play football , remember also Mulholland and his squad if coaches are into this mess than a year , time is needed and so.ething Rangers fans have very little of Patience 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,244 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Any reason given why this is an u17s cup, instead of e.g. u20s? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elfideldo 406 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Any reason given why this is an u17s cup, instead of e.g. u20s? Its been an U17/18 tournament for years, the round robin games used to be played at Junior grounds in the late 90's. I 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.