Jump to content

 

 

Rangers staff risk stoking sectarianism hints Glasgow council boss Susan Aitken


Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Elisioth said:

SNP are hardly socialist, snp are capitalists which is shown with their support of the neo-liberal EU. They aren't interested in public ownership of services and more interested in economic growth just like the EU. The named person act is an example of how fascist they actually are.

You are correct Elisioth, SNP are pro capitalism, but it is not accurate to call them 'fascist'......unprincipled opportunists would be more a more apt description in my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, The Shed said:

You are correct Elisioth, SNP are pro capitalism, but it is not accurate to call them 'fascist'......unprincipled opportunists would be more a more apt description in my opinion.

Aye still but that named person act is hardcore totalitarianism which tends to stem from fascism.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, The Shed said:

You are correct Elisioth, SNP are pro capitalism, but it is not accurate to call them 'fascist'......unprincipled opportunists would be more a more apt description in my opinion.

Absolutely. They would sell their mothers if it advanced the cause of independence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Elisioth said:

Aye still but that named person act is hardcore totalitarianism which tends to stem from fascism.

It's not a particularly clever piece of legislation, and I am not denying that in certain circumstances  'Nationalism'  can lean in the direction of 'Fascism' , but that is not the case here. The danger in calling social democrats 'Fascist' is that you alienate whole sections who would be natural allies in any struggle with actual fascists. It happened in Germany in the thirties, and split the opposition to the Nazis. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Shed said:

It's not a particularly clever piece of legislation, and I am not denying that in certain circumstances  'Nationalism'  can lean in the direction of 'Fascism' , but that is not the case here. The danger in calling social democrats 'Fascist' is that you alienate whole sections who would be natural allies in any struggle with actual fascists. It happened in Germany in the thirties, and split the opposition to the Nazis. 

Aye fair point I suppose but its still totalitarianism by a nationalist party, doesn't bode well or instil confidence in their agendas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.