Bill 13,717 Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 Per the UEFA website ... "Currently, clubs can spend up to €5m more than they earn per three-year assessment period. However they can exceed this level to a limit of €30m, if it is entirely covered by a direct contribution/payment from the club owner(s) or a related party. According to UEFA, the idea of this was to 'prevent the build-up of unsustainable debt'." Does anyone understand whether the loans from shareholders, that were then converted to equity, are included in or excluded from FFP assessment? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 Excluded. money spent of the stadium can also be excluded. there was also covid allowances for drops in income. It's clear now the owners aren't putting in cash we need to be very careful here. No doubt part of our summer spending or lack off. Also no doubt part of our desire to up income alla Bisgrove signing up for anything and the museum being needed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sutton_blows_goats 4,206 Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 Imagine we lived in a world of transparency where the board issued a communication and cleared this up for us. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 6,140 Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 It shouldn't have any bearing on small clubs like ours 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 13,623 Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 2 minutes ago, compo said: It shouldn't have any bearing on small clubs like ours 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted September 5, 2022 Author Share Posted September 5, 2022 8 minutes ago, compo said: It shouldn't have any bearing on small clubs like ours It has a bearing on all clubs 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted September 5, 2022 Author Share Posted September 5, 2022 (edited) 23 minutes ago, the gunslinger said: Excluded. money spent of the stadium can also be excluded. there was also covid allowances for drops in income. It's clear now the owners aren't putting in cash we need to be very careful here. No doubt part of our summer spending or lack off. Also no doubt part of our desire to up income alla Bisgrove signing up for anything and the museum being needed. But surely if it's excluded then we ought to be able to spend more rather than less. No? Edit - belay that, I see what you mean be excluded now. Sorry. Edited September 5, 2022 by Bill 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malangsob 1,203 Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 3 hours ago, Gonzo79 said: For Scotland no, but given our position in Europe, we are very much the 'little guy'. Look at our group in CL--Rangers valuation is 30% that of Ajax, and Napoli..(~$400M)...~3% that of Liverpool ($4.4B). Having stated that, clubs of ANY size can encounter economic issues if directed improperly. Rangers should be completely aware of that. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 13,623 Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 Rangers FC is not a "small club". 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted September 5, 2022 Author Share Posted September 5, 2022 22 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said: Rangers FC is not a "small club". It is in financial terms I'm afraid 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.