Frankie 8,149 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Bain has admitted a clause exists but it's �£3million and can't kick in until next summer. As much as I'm reasonably happy with his displays so far if we got �£3million in the summer for a 31 year old I'd be pretty happy also... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanmidd 0 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 As much as I'm reasonably happy with his displays so far if we got �£3million in the summer for a 31 year old I'd be pretty happy also... Spot on. 2 million profit would be a good bit of business 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Have to say id take 3 million for him as strikers as easier to replace but i still wouldnt take 3 million for Hemdani. Does anyone think we will cash in on both them - given Smith 6 million to spread around the team? Personally I think the squad has enough depth at the moment and its experienced, quality and creative players we should only look to bring it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,149 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 It may not be a case of giving Smith more money to spend but to balance the books after spending �£12million in the summer... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Have to say id take 3 million for him as strikers as easier to replace but i still wouldnt take 3 million for Hemdani. Does anyone think we will cash in on both them - given Smith 6 million to spread around the team? Personally I think the squad has enough depth at the moment and its experienced, quality and creative players we should only look to bring it. i would rather see WS giving some of the players he has brought in and hardly played a chance first rather than spend more money on new players Just because some have started slowly and some not at all doesn't mean they are bad players, although some of the performances have been woefull from some players, hopefully it's just taking them time to settle in :cheers: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,195 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Sadly I am inclined to agree with Frankie - I see SDM using it to balance the books rather than re-investing it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 It may not be a case of giving Smith more money to spend but to balance the books after spending �£12million in the summer... Won't the CL run pay for near enough all of that? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,195 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Won't the CL run pay for near enough all of that? It probably will be used to clear down some of the debt. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,149 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Celtic only made �£12million from the CL last season because they were the sole Scottish qualifiers. This season both of us made it so the pot will be halved. Any CL profits plus any sales in January may not be necessarily ploughed back into the team. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 After the group stages we'll be the only scottish team in the competition so all the pot from the knocl outs will be ours 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.