Match Thread [FT] Aberdeen 1 - 1 Rangers (Tavernier 90+4pen)

[CammyF 6,885]

5 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

I was just having a laugh. 

 

I agree with you. 

We have a terrible tenancy to single players out after a bad performance and result when the focus should be on the team performance. 

 

Only one player gets pass marks from me today and that's Cifuentes as he had a terrific 2nd half

Edited November 26, 2023 by CammyF

[Sutton_blows_goats 4,321]

Can’t understand the Aberdeen managers meltdown about our penalty. It’s almost as if they don’t want the rules

to apply if it benefits us.

 

As for the Aberdeen stat of xG 0.47 that can’t be right surely, they had those two one on ones in the first half which should make it at least .7 or .8?

[CammyF 6,885]

2 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

I mean, you did incorrectly assume some of us were happy with a point, and incorrectly assumed that we were not disappointed. 

 

He's not far off. 

Show me where I mentioned Gonzo being happy with a point? 

[Gonzo79 13,751]

1 minute ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

Can’t understand the Aberdeen managers meltdown about our penalty. It’s almost as if they don’t want the rules

to apply if it benefits us.

Basically, our penalties have to be controversial. That's the set narrative.

[Sutton_blows_goats 4,321]

1 minute ago, CammyF said:

 

 

Only one player gets pass marks from me today and that's Cifuentes as he had a terrific 2

He did much better in the second half granted, but I must have missed his moments where he put his stamp on the game. I thought he was as effective as his teammates. That would be not very.

[Rousseau 9,485]

Just now, CammyF said:

We have a terrible tenancy to single players out after a bad performance and result when the focus should be on the team performance. 

 

Only one player gets pass marks from me today and that's Cifuentes as he had a terrific 2

I only singled out Lammers because he missed that one chance. That's it. I can't moan at the whole team for missing that chance. 

 

I moaned at Balogun earlier. 

 

And Lundstram. 

 

And Lawrence and Cantwell, indirectly.

 

You're making a mountain out of a molehill. 

[Gonzo79 13,751]

Just now, CammyF said:

Show me where I mentioned Gonzo being happy with a point? 

Changing the goalposts again, I see.  Seems to be a habit of yours.

[Sutton_blows_goats 4,321]

Just now, Gonzo79 said:

Basically, our penalties have to be controversial. That's the set narrative.

Yup, was the same with the late

pen v hearts. We shouldn’t get late penalties because masons or something.

[Rousseau 9,485]

2 minutes ago, CammyF said:

Show me where I mentioned Gonzo being happy with a point? 

I didn't mention Gonzo. 

 

You said "For all those happy / settling for a point". You've assumed some are happy with a point. I don't think anyone has said they are happy with a point. I said it wasn't a bad result, given the circumstances. I'm still disappointed. 

 

This is silly. 

[CammyF 6,885]

6 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

I mean, you did incorrectly assume some of us were happy with a point, and incorrectly assumed that we were not disappointed. 

 

He's not far off. 

Some do appear happy with a point and others have pointed this out  - do you only read and reply to my posts?