Bluedell 6,351 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 22 minutes ago, buster. said: I'd be more concerned with the new Articles of Association that the consortium want to bring in and the reduction in transparency. Why are you concerned about the new articles? Presumably the new ones will be the model articles, unless you know something different? What reduction in transparency? Being a PLC costs more and makes it more difficult to issue shares. Also I'm not sure why you raised the points in this thread. A statement about a SFA fine has got nothing to do with our corporate arrangements. We can have a view on the statement independent of the points you raise. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,615 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Good statement. Nothing wrong with Brown stating that opinion on RTV. The SFA can GTF. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whosthedado 1,896 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Just now, Gonzo79 said: Good statement. Nothing wrong with Brown stating that opinion on RTV. The SFA can GTF. Bang on. Was literally typing something along these exact lines 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post CammyF 9,752 Posted 6 hours ago Popular Post Share Posted 6 hours ago 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnMc 3,316 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago I'm surprised the club thinks there's a lack of consistency. The authorities are very consistent, they'll ignore anything awkward from any other member except Rangers, they've been consistent with this for years. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
L72 541 Posted 5 hours ago Author Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, Student said: I agree but Brown's comment was unnecessary, could have used the word 'incompetent' for example. I think even if he had said that, the SFA would've levelled the same charge at us. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ready1314 169 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 47 minutes ago, CammyF said: Nailed it . 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,689 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago (edited) They've made a rod for their own back here. Edited 4 hours ago by Blue Moon 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
L72 541 Posted 5 hours ago Author Share Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Blue Moon said: They've made a rod or their own back here. Essentially, they need to monitor and punish every other Scottish football club for similar, every match published on that clubs media channels. That's a lot of review and punishments. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 5,000 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 47 minutes ago, JohnMc said: I'm surprised the club thinks there's a lack of consistency. The authorities are very consistent, they'll ignore anything awkward from any other member except Rangers, they've been consistent with this for years. It's not hypocrisy; it's hierarchy. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.